Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Mars task force/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Martian soil needs a fix.

Martian_soil#Observations currently says:

Water contents of Martian regolith range from <2% by weight to more than ?.

I assume that that question mark is wrong? -- 189.122.52.73 (talk) 09:39, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Heat Shield Rock listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Heat Shield Rock to be moved to Meridiani Planum meteorite. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 20:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

BFR (rocket) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for BFR (rocket) to be moved to Starship (rocket). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

BFR (rocket) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for BFR (rocket) to be moved to Starship-Super Heavy. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Earth-Mars close approaches

I've done a pretty exhaustive search today, and am not finding on Wikipedia any list of the various "close approach" distances for Earth-Mars at their various conjunctions in the past and projected out in the future. I know such data exists in the literature outside of Wikipedia. (e.g., 7.53×10¹⁰ kilometres (46,800,000,000 mi) in 2016 but only 5.76×10¹⁰ kilometres (35,800,000,000 mi) in 2018; and even closer than that in 2003 nearer to 5.46×10¹⁰ kilometres (33,900,000,000 mi) in 2003.)

Am I just missing it? Or is that information that noone has yet got verifiably incorporated into the "encylopedia of human knowledge" like has been done for asteroid close approaches? (where, even a pointer to one source for the minor planet data gets its own article section.

Cheers. N2e (talk) 12:54, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Cydonia (region of Mars) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Cydonia (region of Mars) to be moved to Cydonia (Mars). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Schiaparelli EDM lander listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Schiaparelli EDM lander to be moved to Schiaparelli EDM. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:03, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Starship (rocket and spacecraft) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Starship (rocket and spacecraft) to be moved to Starship (spacecraft). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:03, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

BFR (rocket) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for BFR (rocket) to be moved to SpaceX Starship. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:32, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

List of potential landing sites for human landings / possible long-term habitation on Mars. Let's improve these articles.

SPACEX STARSHIP LANDING SITES ON MARS. M. Golombek1, N. Williams1, P. Wooster2, A. McEwen3, N. Putzig4, A. Bramson5, J. Head6, J. Heldmann7, M. Marinova8, and D. Beaty1, 1 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 2 SpaceX, Hawthorne, CA, 3 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 4 Planetary Science Institute, Lakewood, CO, 5 Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN, 6 Brown University, Providence, RI, 7 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, 8 M3 Interplanetary, Santa Monica, CA.

52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548)

- https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2021/pdf/2420.pdf -

This lists half a dozen or so attractive landing sites for human landings on Mars.

It's time to do what we can to improve articles about these locations.

thx - 2804:14D:5C59:8833:C5BC:35C8:2A3E:EAB4 (talk) 07:15, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Merge proposal

I have proposed to merge Phobos and Deimos in fiction to Mars in fiction. Please join the discussion at Talk:Mars in fiction#Merger proposal (2) Cambalachero (talk) 13:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Evaluation

This article is well written and provides knowledge to the casual reader. Includes plenty of relevant information and links of other topics but is not too in-depth of the planet Mars. This article could have a rating of "Start" to a potential "C".

Timmy Thyme (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Which article? Cambalachero (talk) 16:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

GAR of Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Artem.G (talk) 16:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)