Wikipedia talk:Notability (geographic features)/Archive 12

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Notability of Category 2 listings in New Zealand

This guideline states that nationally protected buildings with more than just mere statistics are presumed notable. Would this apply to category 2 heritage listings in NZ? See List of category 2 historic places in Auckland and List of category 1 historic places in Auckland for comparison. Abydocomist (talk) 07:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Looking at [1] as an example, it looks like only statistics are available. However, I'm not sure how to parse the guideline --- does the "and" bind more tightly than the "or"? i.e., does "more than mere statistics" apply to all official historical features, or just the ones that are not "cultural heritage" or "national heritage"? I'm not sure. — hike395 (talk) 11:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Some like those would obviously not meet notability (based on the heritage listing alone), but others like: [2], do have more than just mere statistics written about them. Abydocomist (talk) 19:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)