Jump to content

Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Boise State University/SOC GENDER 371 (Spring 2018)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
SOC GENDER 371
Institution
Boise State University
Instructor
Ginna Husting
Wikipedia Expert
Shalor (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Social Psychology of Gender
Course dates
2018-01-08 00:00:00 UTC – 2018-05-06 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
40


This course project focuses on structural/social-psychological issues pertinent to the social psychology and social structural issues involved in constructions of beauty & attractiveness, ugliness & unattractiveness as these relate to social inequality and social identity. Students will contribute to and edit wikipedia pages related to these topics, focused on the following ones: beauty ugliness attractiveness unattractiveness glamour, adornment lookism colorism halo effect sexual objectification social stigma ableism ugly law

Student Assigned Reviewing
LindseySparhawk Purging disorder
Vprice03 Transmisogyny
JohnsonB1999 Whitewashing
Lisa Roggenbuck Bearded lady
Carlosmatutes Discrimination based on skin color
Danirumsey2894 Sizeism
Isaacmoore311 Halo Effect
Torreonboisestate Social construction of gender
Sabrinajoy1020 Unattractiveness
Amloper Passing (sociology)
Mariahgonzalez Lookism
Ameliakeily Ableism
Andrewcharlesbsu Social construction of gender
Dtiegs Julia Serano, Self-concealment
Lorenapreston Normalization (people with disabilities)
Laceysnyder Womanless wedding
Megaustt1 Bisexual Erasure
Authenticly25 Discrimination based on skin color Discrimination based on skin color
Cmerkley1103 Beauty
Carissacantu Attractiveness

Timeline

Week 2

Course meetings
Wednesday, 17 January 2018
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

This page breaks down writing a Wikipedia article into a series of steps, or milestones. These steps include online trainings to help you get started on Wikipedia.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:


Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  •  Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.) 
  •  It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade. 
  •  When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page. 
Milestones

This week, everyone should have a Wikipedia account.

Week 3

Course meetings
Monday, 22 January 2018   |   Wednesday, 24 January 2018
Assignment - Evaluate Wikipedia

 It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page. 


  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings. 
  • Review the Wikipedia articles about the social construction of gender and female body shape. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    •  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? 
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    •  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? 
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  •  Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to one of the articles you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:20, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


In class - Discussion
What's a content gap?

Now that you're thinking about what makes a "good" Wikipedia article, consider some additional questions.

  • Wikipedians often talk about "content gaps." What do you think a content gap is, and what are some possible ways to identify them?
  • What are some reasons a content gap might arise? What are some ways to remedy them?
  • Does it matter who writes Wikipedia?
  • What does it mean to be "unbiased" on Wikipedia? How is that different, or similar, to your own definition of "bias"?

Week 4

Course meetings
Monday, 29 January 2018   |   Wednesday, 31 January 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about sources and plagiarism
  • Blog posts and press releases are considered poor sources of reliable information. Why?
  • What are some reasons you might not want to use a company's website as the main source of information about that company?
  • What is the difference between a copyright violation and plagiarism?
  • What are some good techniques to avoid close paraphrasing and plagiarism?


Assignment - Choose your topic / Find your sources

It's time to choose an article and assign it to yourself.


  • Review page 6 of your Editing Wikipedia guidebook.
  • Find an article from the list of "Available Articles" on the Articles tab on this course page. When you find the one you want to work on, click Select to assign it to yourself. If you don't see a topic you're interested in, you can review the Finding Your Articletraining and select your own topic. Must be approved by your instructor. 
  •  In your sandbox, write a few sentences about what you plan to contribute to the selected article. 
    • Think back to when you did an article critique. What can you add? Post some of your ideas to the article's talk page. 
    • Start compiling a list of relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography. 
    • If your topic is related to medicine, human health, and psychology, please review the "Editing Medical Topics" training linked below. 


Download relevant guide(s) for writing articles in your topic area

History

Political Science

Psychology

Sociology

Women's Studies

Week 5

Course meetings
Monday, 5 February 2018   |   Wednesday, 7 February 2018
Midterm will be on Monday Feb 7th

Week 6

Course meetings
Monday, 12 February 2018   |   Wednesday, 14 February 2018

Week 7

Course meetings
Wednesday, 21 February 2018

Week 8

Course meetings
Monday, 26 February 2018   |   Wednesday, 28 February 2018
Research summaries due on WednesdayMarch 3 on BLACKBOARD

March 3, due on BLACKBOARD:  3 summaries of 2-3 pages each, double-spaced with full ASA style bibliography of your research articles.  Graded on quality and coherence of summary; relevance and quality of articles chosen.   

Please see our Blackboard page for handouts on writing style, grammar, etc.   

Consider taking a draft of your summaries to the Writing Center; you can make an appointment in advance here
https://writingcenter.boisestate.edu/


Week 9

Course meetings
Monday, 5 March 2018   |   Wednesday, 7 March 2018
In class - Discussion
Thinking about Wikipedia
  • What do you think of Wikipedia's definition of "neutrality"?
  • What are the impacts and limits of Wikipedia as a source of information?
  • On Wikipedia, all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. What kinds of sources does this exclude? Can you think of any problems that might create?
  • If Wikipedia was written 100 years ago, how might its content (and contributors) be different? What about 100 years from now?


Assignment - Draft your article

You've picked a topic and found your sources. Now it's time to start writing.

Creating a new article?

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox.
    • A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas.

Improving an existing article?

  • Identify what's missing from the current form of the article. Think back to the skills you learned while critiquing an article. Make notes for improvement in your sandbox.



Keep reading your sources, too, as you prepare to write the body of the article.

Resources: Editing Wikipedia pages 7–9

Milestones

Everyone has begun writing their article drafts.

Week 10

Course meetings
Monday, 12 March 2018   |   Wednesday, 14 March 2018
Assignment - Expand your draft
  • Keep working on transforming your article into a complete first draft. Get draft ready for peer-review. Please take the peer review training before coming to class on Monday March 26th. 
  • If you'd like a Wikipedia Expert to review your draft, now is the time! Click the "Get Help" button in your sandbox to request notes. 

Week 11

Course meetings
Monday, 19 March 2018   |   Wednesday, 21 March 2018
Spring Break

Reminder to take the Peer Review training before coming to class on Monday after break! 

Week 12

Course meetings
Monday, 26 March 2018   |   Wednesday, 28 March 2018
In class - Monday in class
Peer review and copy edit
  • Select two classmates' articles that you will peer review and copyedit. On the Articles tab, find the articles that you want to review. Then in the "My Articles" section of the Home tab, assign it to yourself to review. 
  • Peer review your classmates' draft. Leave suggestions on the Talk page of the article, or sandbox, that your fellow student is working on. Other editors may be reviewing your work, so look for their comments! Be sure to acknowledge feedback from other Wikipedians. 
  • As you review, make spelling, grammar, and other adjustments. Pay attention to the tone of the article. Is it encyclopedic? 
Milestones

Every student has finished reviewing their assigned articles, making sure that every article has been reviewed.


Assignment - Respond to your peer review

You probably have some feedback from other students and possibly other Wikipedians. It's time to work with that feedback to improve your article!

  • Read Editing Wikipedia pages 12 and 14.
  • Return to your draft or article and think about the suggestions. Decide which ones to start implementing. Reach out to your instructor or your Wikipedia Expert if you have any questions.

Week 13

Course meetings
Monday, 2 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 4 April 2018
In class - In class on Monday
Begin moving your work to Wikipedia

Once you've made improvements to your article based on peer review feedback, it's time to move your work to Wikipedia proper - the "mainspace." 


Editing an existing article?


  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  •  Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving! 
  •  Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly. 

Creating a new article?


Week 14

Course meetings
Monday, 9 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 11 April 2018
Assignment - Continue improving your article

Do additional research and writing to make further improvements to your article, based on suggestions and your own critique.


  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles. 
  • Consider adding an image to your article. Wikipedia has strict rules about what media can be added, so make sure to take Contributing Images and Media Files training before you upload an image. 

Week 15

Course meetings
Monday, 16 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 18 April 2018
Assignment - Final article

It's the final week to develop your article.

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.
  • Don't forget that you can ask for help from your Wikipedia Expert at any time!

Week 16

Course meetings
Monday, 23 April 2018   |   Wednesday, 25 April 2018
Assignment - Reflective essay due May 2nd

Write a reflective essay (2–5 pages) on your Wikipedia contributions.

Consider the following questions as you reflect on your Wikipedia assignment:

  • Critiquing articles: What did you learn about Wikipedia during the article evaluation? How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?
  • Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?
  • Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?
  • Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?
  • Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?
Milestones

Everyone should have finished all of the work they'll do on Wikipedia, and be ready for grading.