Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Chronicles of Narnia task force/Assessment
Chronicles of Narnia task force | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Narnia articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | Total | ||
![]() |
2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
B | 3 | 2 | 5 | 10 | |||
C | 8 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 22 | ||
Start | 7 | 7 | 16 | 11 | 41 | ||
Stub | 6 | 6 | |||||
List | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
Category | 1 | 7 | 30 | 38 | |||
Disambig | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||
Project | 1 | 9 | 10 | ||||
Redirect | 2 | 4 | 4 | 91 | 101 | ||
Template | 4 | 4 | |||||
Assessed | 19 | 21 | 36 | 29 | 135 | 240 | |
Total | 19 | 21 | 36 | 29 | 135 | 240 | |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 367 | Ω = 4.42 |
Quality: FA-Class | A Class | GA-Class | B-Class | Start-Class | Stub Class | Redirect Class | Unassessed
Welcome to the assessment department of Chronicles of Narnia task force! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Narnia articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{NovelsWikiProject}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Narnia articles by quality and Category:Narnia articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questions
[edit]- How do I add an article to the task force?
- Just add {{NovelsWikiProject|narnia-task-force=yes}} to the talk page; there's no need to do anything else.
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Narnia WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article. Please add your name to the list of participants if you wish to assess articles on a regular basis.
- Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?
- Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are (see, in particular, the disclaimers on the importance scale), but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
Instructions
[edit]An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Novels}} project banner on its talk page (see the project banner instructions for more details on the exact syntax):
- {{WikiProject Novels| ... | class=??? | importance=??? | ...}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter:
- FA (adds articles to Category:FA-Class novel articles)
- FL (adds articles to Category:FL-Class novel articles) - Featured List (subject to the same controls as FA)
- A (adds articles to Category:A-Class novel articles)
- GA (adds articles to Category:GA-Class novel articles)
- B (adds articles to Category:B-Class novel articles)
- C (adds articles to Category:C-Class novel articles)
- Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class novel articles)
- Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class novel articles)
- NA (for pages, such as templates or disambiguation pages, where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class novel articles)
- Cat (adds articles to Category:Category-Class novel articles)
- Dab (adds articles to Category:Disambig-Class novel articles)
- List (adds articles to Category:List-Class novel articles)
- Portal (adds articles to Category:Portal-Class novel articles)
- Project (adds articles to Category:Project-Class novel articles)
- Redirect (adds articles to Category:Redirect-Class novel articles)
- Template (adds articles to Category:Template-Class novel articles)
Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed novel articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.
The following values may be used for the importance parameter:
- Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance novel articles)
- High (adds articles to Category:High-importance novel articles)
- Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance novel articles)
- Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance novel articles)
The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the importance scale below.
Quality scale
[edit]Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
![]() |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
Category | Any category falls under this class. | Categories are mainly used to group together articles within a particular subject area. | Large categories may need to be split into one or more subcategories. Be wary of articles that have been miscategorized. | Category:The Chronicles of Narnia |
Project | All WikiProject-related pages fall under this class. | Project pages are intended to aid editors in article development. | Develop these pages into collaborative resources that are useful for improving articles within the project. | Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Chronicles of Narnia task force |
Redirect | Any redirect falls under this class. | The page redirects to another article with a similar name, related topic or that has been merged with the original article at this location. | Editor involvement is essential to ensure that articles are not mis-classified as redirects, and that redirects are not mis-classified as articles. | Alambil (as of June 2018) |
Template | Any template falls under this class. The most common types of templates include infoboxes and navboxes. | Different types of templates serve different purposes. Infoboxes provide easy access to key pieces of information about the subject. Navboxes are for the purpose of grouping together related subjects into an easily accessible format, to assist the user in navigating between articles. | Infoboxes are typically placed at the upper right of an article, while navboxes normally go across the very bottom of a page. Beware of too many different templates, as well as templates that give either too little, too much, or too specialized information. | Template:Narnia-stub |
NA | Any non-article page that fits no other classification. | The page contains no article content. | Look out for misclassified articles. Currently, many NA-class articles may need to be re-classified. |
Importance scale
[edit]The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important".
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is a "core" topic within The Chronicles of Narnia. | The Chronicles of Narnia |
High | Subject is very notable or significant within The Chronicles of Narnia. | White Witch |
Mid | Subject is notable within The Chronicles of Narnia, but not necessarily outside of it. | Telmarines |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within The Chronicles of Narnia. It may only be included to achieve comprehensive coverage of a notable subject. | The Roar of Love |
NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | Category:The Chronicles of Narnia |
??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. | None (as of June 2018) |
Requesting an assessment
[edit]If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
Example assessments
[edit]To assess an article, paste one of the following onto the article's talk page.
Quality
- {{NovelsWikiProject|class=FA|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at FA-Class
- {{NovelsWikiProject|class=A|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at A-Class
- {{NovelsWikiProject|class=GA|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at GA-Class
- {{NovelsWikiProject|class=B|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at B-Class
- {{NovelsWikiProject|class=Start|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at Start-Class
- {{NovelsWikiProject|class=Stub|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at Stub-Class
- {{NovelsWikiProject|class=Redirect|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to note that this is a Redirected Narnia article
- {{NovelsWikiProject|class=NA|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to say that this is a Narnia page, but not an article
- {{NovelsWikiProject|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to leave the article un-assessed.
Importance
- {{NovelsWikiProject|importance=Top|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at Top importance
- {{NovelsWikiProject|importance=High|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at High importance
- {{NovelsWikiProject|importance=Mid|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at Mid importance
- {{NovelsWikiProject|importance=Low|narnia-task-force=yes}} - to rate an article at Low importance
Article Assessments
[edit]Assessment log (updated by bot)
[edit]There were no logs for this project from August 19, 2024 - August 26, 2024.