Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Inline Templates/Participants

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Participants

[edit]

Please feel free to add yourself here, and to indicate any areas of particular interest.

  1. -- SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 01:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC) (Consistency, browser compatibility, correct WP categorization, proper documentation)[reply]
  2. -- snowolfD4( talk / @ ) 07:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC) (making sure they're aesthetically pleasing, clearly identify their purpose)[reply]
  3. -- Pomte (talk · contribs) 05:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC) (discussion, documentation)[reply]
  4. -- Random832 02:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. -- Xiaphias 05:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC) (same as Snowolf; distracting or overly-vague tags aren't helpful)[reply]
  6. -- danielfolsom 18:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC) (Consistency, clean up)[reply]
  7. -- User:Ludwigs2 23:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC) (general handiwork)[reply]
  8. -- Rich Farmbrough, 19:22 5 February 2009 (UTC). general contributions, try and keep some coherence.
  9. -- Pstanton Hey, what a great project, I usually go through and try and find, and then tag flaws in-line flaws in articles, so this is a really great wiki project for me! I have a hard time finding specific tags, so hopefully the list here will help. --Pstanton (talk) 19:13, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. -- Kevinkor2 (talk) 09:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC) (I am back! (See User:Kevinkor2#Wikipedia as a MMORPG.)) general handiwork.[reply]
  11. -- Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 08:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC) (all kinds of issues/improvements).[reply]
  12. -- JJB 19:03, 31 May 2012 (UTC) Here's a WikiProject I can work with!
  13. -- Hex [t/c] 07:40, 7 August 2012 (UTC) Standardization is good![reply]
  14. -- User:Jason Quinn... want things to be "the way they should be"
  15. -- User:OrenBochman looking to use these to improve communications with new users
  16. -- User:Northamerica1000
  17. -- Le Prof, User:Leprof_7272, interests: completeness and cohesion of tags (syntax and variants for all common, comparable, and memorable); gap-filling of any missing tags relative to section and article tags; gap-filling of any missing tags for common content quality issues related to fact-sourcing, general verifiability, or plagiarism