Wikipedia:Picture peer review/BumblebeeOnLavendar
A detailed picture of a Danish bumblebee on a popular plant of theirs - lavendar.
- Articles this image appears in
- no articles yet, but will be in the bumblebee article if the feedback is good enough.
- Creator
- TobiasKierk
- Suggested by
- TobiasKierk (talk) 22:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comments
- We have very high standards when it comes to insect featured pictures, see Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Animals/Insects, there is focus issues here, size, lighting and some weird hair thats distracting. Don't see this passing FPC or VPC, sorry. — raekyT 22:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- To add, I'm not sure Bumblebee needs any additional pictures, I don't see where this picture is specifically better then any of the others as a replacement or that it adds something not already covered by one of the other pictures. Sorry. — raekyT 22:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that the hair are a bit distracting. I will try to remove them. However, I don't see any light, size or focus issues. The size is like many other pictures (including featured) on wikipedia. Regarding the Bumblebee article, this picture has some serious focus and size problems:
. I've added my picture to the Lavender article, where it suits pretty well. TobiasKierk (talk) 23:12, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yea lavender does need some more pictures, I donno, it could replace the linked image, you can either be WP:BOLD and do it, or ask on the talk page for other editors of that article's opinion. — raekyT 01:11, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that the hair are a bit distracting. I will try to remove them. However, I don't see any light, size or focus issues. The size is like many other pictures (including featured) on wikipedia. Regarding the Bumblebee article, this picture has some serious focus and size problems:
- To add, I'm not sure Bumblebee needs any additional pictures, I don't see where this picture is specifically better then any of the others as a replacement or that it adds something not already covered by one of the other pictures. Sorry. — raekyT 22:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Seconder