Wikipedia:Peer review/Go to the Future/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'd like to get my music articles up to A/GA/FA-level quality. I've managed to create a featured list discography before, but I'd like to see what the different approaches are for regular articles.
Thanks, Prosperosity (talk) 11:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Did a quick spot-check for the GA criteria and two issues popped up. From Criteria 1b, the lead section doesn't adequately summarise the article, see WP:LEADLENGTH (think two-three paras should do). From criteria 3b, inline citations should be provided where necessary. I see that the critical reception has quotations and strictly speaking, each sentence needs an inline cite to back it up; two don't have it. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 11:10, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- How's that? I've beefed the intro up to two, and added an in-line citation for each line in the commercial reception. --Prosperosity (talk) 09:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe a little more fleshing out would do for the lead. Otherwise I don't see anything big stopping it for GA. Good luck with it but be prepared to wait for long because of the backlog, work on the something else till then. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Done. Thanks for your input! --Prosperosity (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe a little more fleshing out would do for the lead. Otherwise I don't see anything big stopping it for GA. Good luck with it but be prepared to wait for long because of the backlog, work on the something else till then. Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 13:47, 13 March 2015 (UTC)