Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Lunar Eclipse

Oppose. Image is too small at 640 × 460 pixels. Image doesn't appear to be stable in the article (I see a bit of edit warring regarding its inclusion in the page history) Matthewedwards : Chat 05:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC*)
Meh...not quite I totally love the concept of someone supplying us with photos via a telescope. That said, caption left me wanting and I didn't really get that much out of the image. Really in that article, the diagram showing the 3 bodies and penumbra and all was much more crucial.TCO (talk) 17:52, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to the small size. J Milburn (talk) 20:31, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As comments above - its too small --Thecheesefiles (talk) 10:21, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality and res. As a side note, why does the article include the photographer's name? I removed it but the photographer re-inserted it. IMO, my image of eclipse is superior --Muhammad(talk) 20:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]