Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Falcipennis canadensis

Falcipennis canadensis

A high quality, encyclopedic, and attractive photo of a female spruce grouse. Appears in spruce grouse, created by Mdf.

Nominate and support. - Pharaoh Hound (talk) 18:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I only wish there was more detail, so I could appreciate the plumage better. NauticaShad e s 19:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --KFP (talk | contribs) 20:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice image, though I do agree with Nautica. Hello32020 03:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great photo. --SonicChao 21:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
weak support - weak because of detail, per Nauticashades. I think there is waning enthusiasm for bird FPCs, given the paucity of votes on these two recent nominees. Debivort 22:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - not very appealing to the eye. --Ineffable3000 23:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. A little blurry (per Nauticashades). --Tewy 04:19, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nice quality as usual from Mdf, but not attractive to the eye - bland background and not ideal positioning of bird. --jjron 12:48, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good wildlife photo. Ackatsis 06:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Good quality but not very eye catching. I guess that isn't the birds fault but smile for crying out loudBuphoff 20:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I think there is plenty of detail there to be honest. You won't get much more detail than this out of any modern camera. Yes, it has been downsampled but that USUALLY just makes existing detail sharper rather than removing a lot of detail. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 00:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Falcipennis-canadensis-001.jpg --Fir0002 04:35, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]