Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2014 Winter Olympics medal table/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN 21:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC) [1].[reply]
2014 Winter Olympics medal table (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I've recently been working on it and have based its layout on a number of other featured medal tables. I believe it may now meet the criteria for inclusion and will be willing to fix any issues. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Birdienest81 (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Bleacher Report is usually not considered a reliable source based on previous discussions such as this one. Here is an article from The New York Times about Armin Zöggeler that makes reference to his record.
Comment by Birdienest81
|
Support: I can confidently confirm my support for this list now that a few more people have proofread the list.
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
30em.
That's about it! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support no major pressing issues for me. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:00, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The red in the image needs to become something like green. Also, the legend is missing and "eleven" is a joke. Nergaal (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- None of this is actionable, what "legend" do you want? What do you mean by "eleven" is a joke? If you'd like to help then please help, otherwise I suggest you don't continue to add such cryptic and unhelpful commentary. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:43, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks fine now, but are there deleted entries in the history of the article after Aug 31? Nergaal (talk) 18:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- No, why? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Nvm, I am pretty sure I remember seeing "11" being spelled out in the table, but maybe there was some sort of glitch. Nergaal (talk) 22:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- No, why? The Rambling Man (talk) 18:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It looks fine now, but are there deleted entries in the history of the article after Aug 31? Nergaal (talk) 18:15, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Nergaal (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*"with a historic tie in alpine skiing." is a bit vague. The historic part was that it was the first time a gold was tied or any medal, or that the fight for the medal was a historic one?
Nergaal (talk) 18:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support and feel free to rc my comments. Nergaal (talk) 17:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Ravendrop 17:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
30em.
Comments by Ravendrop
|
- I support the article. Looks Good. Ravendrop 19:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I've adopted the wording used in the main article. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Closing this nomination as passed. Remember to review other people's nominations, so that future nominations will run faster! --PresN 21:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.