Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Gun Powder Ma
Wikipedian filing request:
Other Wikipedians this pertains to:
Wikipedia pages this pertains to:
Questions:
[edit]Have you read the AMA FAQ?
- Answer: yeah.
How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)
- Answer: deletion
What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.
- Answer: None, because the person who deleted my article, also deleted the discussion on the page.
What do you expect to get from Advocacy?
- Answer: permission to start a topic on "the world's largest domes"
Summary:
[edit]Why do I want to create an article on the world's largest domes? Because there is already one the the world's tallest buildings, the world's tallest churches, the world's tallest skycrapers and the world's longest tunnels. So why not one the world's largest domes? Domes have been a very important feature of architecture since Roman times at least (Parthenon, Hagia Sophia, Dome of Florence, St. Pauls, etc. etc.).
Discussion:
[edit]- All discussion is archived at User:Royalguard11/Desk/archive/Case 4. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Followup:
[edit]When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:
Did you find the Advocacy process useful?
- Answer: y
Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?
- Answer: y
On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?
- Answer: 4
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?
- Answer: 4
On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?
- Answer: 4
If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?
- Answer: -
If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?
- Answer: -
AMA Information
[edit]Case Status: closed
Advocate Status:
- Open. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 02:59, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Answers are filled, advocacy was succesful. Closed. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 23:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)