User talk:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/article1

Pre-Edit Peer Review

Name of student reviewer **	Wikipedia User: Aaleksanian
Date of review	5/5/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Xyzbb1253
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/article1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/5/2013
Date review submitted to instructor	5/5/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image not needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	The information provided was accurate from the article
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	N/A
Wikiformatting	Nice formatting
Grammar & composition	Well done
Other comments	Great job!

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: DJames5
Date of review	5/6/13
Name of editorReplace with username for version on talk page	Xyzbb1253
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/article1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/6/13
Date review submitted to instructor	5/6/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	n/a
Wikiformatting	Fine
Grammar & composition	Good
Other comments	None
Reviewer's Signature	DJames5 (talk) 16:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer Replace with username for version on talk page	Wikipedia User: Trinirebel (talk) 18:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Date of review	5/8/13
Name of editorReplace with username for version on talk page	Xyzbb1253
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/article1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor	5/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	n/a
Wikiformatting	Good formatting
Grammar & composition	Good
Other comments	None
Reviewer's Signature	Trinirebel (talk) 18:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer *	Wikipedia User:M.Caban
Date of review	5/8/2013
Name of editorReplace with username for version on talk page	Wikipedia User: Xyzbb1253
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253/sandbox/article1
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	5/8/2013
Date review submitted to instructor	5/8/2013
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	Image not needed.
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Information is accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	yes
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	N/A
Wikiformatting	Nice format
Grammar & composition	None found
Other comments	very good job

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Angela Sandy
Date of review	5/13/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User:Xyzbb1253
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Xyzbb1253
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	The length of the article is sufficient
Image (needed/appropriate)	n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Textbook information is accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	The article is accurate for I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Solid content and good choice on adding bullets
Grammar & composition	Grammar & compostition is good!
Other comments	Good job!