User talk:Xuz

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Altenmann (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to this sockpuppet investigation for evidence.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

XUZ Welcome!

Hello, Xuz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Dr.K. (logos) 23:32, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repair link at Talk:San_Jose,_California#One_mil_popolation

Hi Xuz,

I'm just having a quick look into your request for third party comment, but in the process noticed you'd linked to W:OWN in the section Talk:San_Jose,_California#One_mil_popolation.

On the assumption that you really meant to include a link to WP:OWN rather than W:OWN (which doesn't make much sense in this context), I edited the link in your comment.

If I was wrong, you are off course free to revert the change with my sincerest apologies.

If I can get the time I will offer a third party comment in the very near future.

Regards, -- Muzhogg (talk) 09:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you were right. Xuz (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

California State Beach

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of California State Beach, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: California State Beaches. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Links

I originally actually considered them irrelevant and too minor of the topic to include in an article about Shanghai. That said, am willing to leave them there after a little more research on those two topics to see how much information is already out there. Mfisherkirshner (talk) 13:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tags on Variation on a theme

Can you argument on the Talk:Variation on a theme, the reason why you put the three tags? Thanks.--Sum (talk) 10:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]