User talk:Wurzeln und Flügel

Hello, Wurzeln und Flügel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! 195.113.8.138 (talk) 16:43, 1 June 2010 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Beneš decrees, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 20:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

As soon as I have got the time I will do it. I am a hard-working person.--Wurzeln und Flügel (talk) 17:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to History of Czechoslovakia. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--ja_62 17:08, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

No time at the moment. But may be in summer!--Wurzeln und Flügel (talk) 17:20, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Lech, Czech and Rus, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --ja_62 17:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

I am a historian and this is the historical truth. There is nothing offensive to it.--Wurzeln und Flügel (talk) 17:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps for yourself, but here in WIkipedia reliable sources are needed, not your opinions nor original research.--ja_62 17:21, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Maybe you know the historical truth better. So please inform me! I can`understand why could be wrong with this statement. --Wurzeln und Flügel (talk) 17:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

I honestly think it is hard to prove facts which are or should be general knowledge. I am often surprised about the many quotations about every-day knowledge.--Wurzeln und Flügel (talk) 17:32, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

I attempted to inform you on certain Wikipedia policies which are adhered to. The statement in nutshell could be summarised as: "Unsubstantiated subjective opinions of individual editors can't be taken as "the Truth", and anyway third-party sources are necessary on Wikipedia, not The Truth." (and not somewhen "in summer"). If you can't understand what's wrong with your unsourced opinions in view of these policies, I see no way to explain it to you online. Regards. --ja_62 17:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

p.s.:If it's difficult to you to find sources substantiating your opinions, then they are perhaps only opinions, don't they? --ja_62 17:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

How can you prove it, when nobody knows - even they themselves - where they come from--Wurzeln und Flügel (talk) 17:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

If you are talking specifically about your changes you made in article Lech, Czech and Rus (and not the other vandal edits you made in other articles), then you have perhaps come with some scholarly source supporting the claim that there is any connection between the myth and uncertainity concerning the Slavic homeland. If you are claiming that that's matter of common knowledge, then it couldn't be so difficult to come with at least one reliable source. --ja_62 17:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

• By the way, you have same problems in German wiki, as can be seen here [1]. I hope, that you understand, that we have some rules, as neutrality and verifiability. On side, I´m partially Böhmen Deutsche and my ancestors were not transferred (and were not commies). I understand, that you are unhappy with your family fate, but you can establish blog about your feelings and Wikipedia will be free of some subjective notes. Thank you for understanding.--Yopie (talk) 22:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

It is not only a personal thing as I am a historian and a little bit angry and frustrated that eye witnesses are not taken consideration, which is absolutely the best source and very often not possible anymore. Surviving Jews lecture at schools. The best thing they can do for the victims and for coming generations. As you may have noticed I used to study in the UK, too. There are no experts in Wikipedia - a pity!--92.224.207.230 (talk) 16:18, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

There are hardly any surviving witnesses to the time of Lech, Czech and Rus... And even if they were any, own research is not a reliable source.--195.113.8.138 (talk) 13:42, 7 June 2010 (UTC)