User talk:Winkers6767

It is suspected or confirmed that this user has used one or more sock puppets for abuse, libel, or ban evasion.
See block log, list of suspected puppets and list of confirmed puppets.
The use of abusive sock puppets on Wikipedia is prohibited; use of sock puppets to evade bans results in the ban timer being reset and may further lengthen it.

Feb 2007

Timothy Dees

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Timothy Dees, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. RJASE1 05:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been nominated under the AFD process here. RJASE1 06:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Timothy Dees. If you continue to do so, it may be considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Vox Rationis 04:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Winkers6767 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. RJASE1 15:06, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Dees

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Dees, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -David Schaich ^Talk/_Cont 05:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block timer reset

Your block timer has been reset as you were caught trying to continue editing during your block. This is a violation of WP:SOCK. Any further violations will result in an indefinite block from Wikipedia. --Yamla 02:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.