User talk:Walmartfan

Welcome!

Hello, Walmartfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Wsyx-dt2, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 10:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wsyx-dt2

The article Wsyx-dt2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no information that justifies a separate page from the main WSYX article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 10:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of WLEP-LP

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vipin Hari || talk 13:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from WLEP-LP, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Vipin Hari || talk 13:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Wsyx-dt2

I have nominated Wsyx-dt2, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wsyx-dt2. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 13:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Files in your User Space

Hey there Walmartfan, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Walmartfan. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of files removed today here.

Shut off the bot here.

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 12:21, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Wal-Mart has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Allmightyduck (alt)  What's wrong? 15:33, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at KFC. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Philip Trueman (talk) 15:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

A tag has been placed on AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fæ (talk) 15:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 48 hours

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Frankly, I suspect you're a sock of a banned user given your choice of subject matter. That last bit of nonsense with the repeating characters was totally unneccesary. If the nonsense starts up when the block lifts, the next block will be indefinite. PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:42, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walmart complete.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Walmart complete.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PilotFlyingJ.png

A tag has been placed on File:PilotFlyingJ.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 00:30, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Walmart complete.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walmart complete.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Eeekster (talk) 00:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HoneydaleMall.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:HoneydaleMall.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mountain Plaza Mall

The article Mountain Plaza Mall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails notability at WP:NOTNEWS (Item #4). This unsourced article is a news item of local (unknown village, town, city, county, country) interest only.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 00:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mountain Plaza Mall

A tag has been placed on Mountain Plaza Mall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fæ (talk) 01:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

I have reverted your restoration of Wsyx-dt2. The AfD was clear: there is no independent, verified value to the article, and a consensus of editors stated so in the AfD. In the absence of new and verified information establishing independent notability, the redirect should stand. I note also that you did not participate in the AfD discussion, which is a shame--that is where your opinion could have been heard. Please don't undo the redirect unless it is with a substantially different article. Drmies (talk) 14:28, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Mountain Plaza Mall. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Woolco

We do not allow store lists on Wikipedia; they violate WP:IINFO. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:HoneydaleMall.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HoneydaleMall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Walmartincanada.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walmartincanada.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free images on your userpage

Please stop restoring non-free images to your userpage, as you did here. The use of non-free images on userpages is strictly forbidden by our policy at WP:NFCC #9. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:12, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you persist in violating our WP:NFCC policy, as you did with this edit you will be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Startrekkes.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Startrekkes.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 08:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Startrekkes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Startrekkes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 13:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Startrekkes.jpg and Kes (Star Trek)

I've removed this image from the article. We do not need to have two non-free images to depict this character. It's pointless. File:Kes.jpg is a superior quality image anyway, and conveys the same meaning, serves the same purpose as the image you uploaded. Stop restoring the image to the article. If you have questions, ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:25, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Startrekkes.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Startrekkes.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Fox News Channel. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. –CWenger (^ • @) 19:11, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –CWenger (^ • @) 22:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please stop uploading large copyrighted images, as you did with File:Robloxgame.jpg. It is not allowed. See our copyright policy for more information. If you continue to revert you will be blocked from editing, so please stop. Thanks, Theleftorium ^(talk) 22:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

regarding your edit recent edit summary

How?

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Walmartfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the file was mine of the Robloxgame and i should have control over it

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Robloxgame.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robloxgame.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]