User talk:Utopianheaven
Earthquake
[edit]Seriously, it's way early to tag for notability. It's still dark in the region and it will be a couple hours before daylight and the chance to evaluate things. --InDeBiz1 (talk) 10:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Please see my comment about the very issues you brought up on the article's talk page. Respectfully, --InDeBiz1 (talk) 10:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/37/Ophioblennius_steindachneri.jpg/100px-Ophioblennius_steindachneri.jpg)
Da panda of pandemonium has given you a blenny! Blennies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day much better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a blenny, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
Give someone a blenny by adding {{subst:Blenny}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Your edits are shaking me down. I go lower than a blenny. Hug da panda. DPandaOPande (talk) 22:39, 5 December 2012 (UTC)DPandaOPande
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:UCLA Bruins Logo.png
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:UCLA Bruins Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 20:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
![Notice](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The file File:UCLA Bruins Logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)