User talk:The Br3

If I don't respond quickly to your message it's because I'm taking a crap

The current time is 10:51 UTC

Brando, I realize you disagree with The Courier-Journal, but it simply isn't encyclopedic to change references to The Communist-Journal. Thanks. BabuBhatt 18:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In this article I put it in as a joke while reconstucting the page and forgot to revert it (just like calling Pitino Rickhammad al-Pitino or saying the last baseball NCAA appear. was in 1823) I was venting the other day on the C-J site which shouldn't have been done and needed to be reverted, however you didn't have to be a smart ass about it. There are legitimate complaints about the CJ's unprofessional sports coverage (to both U of L & UK), esp. when compared with other papers. It is certainly not as highly esteemed as the article makes it sound, which makes me question its POV. The Br3 18:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies if my edit summary on The Courier-Journal appeared smart-ass to you. Just a reactionary thing, I guess when I saw many statements with no sources there. I don't read the C-J regularly, so I can't attest to its biases in sports coverage. If you find sources stating these things, you could construct a criticism section with attribution there, but only with sources, since there is no original research on wikipedia. Apparently, I also set you off on a rampage of vandalism with that edit summary as well; up until that time, I only saw positive contributions from you and then I figured someone hijacked your username and was making all kinds of joke edits. I didn't appreciate all the wanton changes to my userpage and talk page. The changes were almost immediately reverted, so I am unsure what satisfaction you got from it. I don't mean to enrage you again, but ethnic slurs really have no place in an encyclopedia, and secondly, you really don't know my ethnicity just based on a username I got from Seinfeld. I hope to work positively with you on Kentucky-related articles in the future. Thanks. BabuBhatt 19:40, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Just out of curiousity..why did you add and then delete vandalism from Fart?QuizQuick 02:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pussy pic

Just out of curiosity... why did you change the picture of Sarah Michelle Gellar into a seemingly trivial cat?

Mr Ernest isn't a "trivial cat". If you said that to his face he would stratch your eyes out. However, upoading a pic with just a # for a name will create future problems for both of us by accident, so I can upload his pic by a different name. You should consider doing the same. The Br3 01:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to The Courier-Journal

Please do not add commentary and your personal analysis of an article into Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. BaseballBaby 23:09, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Brando03.

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet evading a block placed on User:Brando03. JDoorj a m Talk 23:55, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

I wanted to offer to help you get unblocked. You made some decent contributions to Kentucky-related articles, and I find it hard to believe that we're better off without you. There just seems to be a misunderstanding over putting personal opinions into the article on The Courier-Journal, which I'd like to help you with if you're interested. If you want, I will talk to the admins who blocked you and I think they'll rescind their blocks if I mentor you and you indicate you won't "vandalize" that article anymore. So let me know. Thanks. --W.marsh 00:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:BOWMAN_Kelley_06NCAA_KL.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BOWMAN_Kelley_06NCAA_KL.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg

Hello The Br3, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg) was found at the following location: User talk:The Br3. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:ULbase2005.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ULbase2005.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ULbball04-05.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ULbball04-05.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ULftb05.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ULftb05.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:32, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Battle4bluegrass.GIF or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fieldhockey05.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fieldhockey05.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:09, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ulvolleyball05.JPG

The file File:Ulvolleyball05.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We are not a repository of sports stats. Unused graph of scores with no specific significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:PJCardStad.GIF

The file File:PJCardStad.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, low quality, no meaningful encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]