User talk:ThePeopleWalbunja

June 2024

Hello, I'm TornadoLGS. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Walbunja, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 17:40, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an official representative of the Government of the Peoples Territory of Walbunja. I have been ordered to attempt the corrections of information and content that pertains and records the People of Walbunja. ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 17:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That makes no difference. Your edits still have to comply with Wikipedia policy. If anything this creates a potential conflict of interest. You will also have to declare if you have been paid to do this. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I not being paid to do this, Im an Indigenous administrator of a Local Community of Walbunja in (English the town is called Moruya) in Dhurga the town is called "Pergoga" this is the words i and my people the Walbunja people speak each day as we have spoken for thousands of years before the arrival of the British and Europeans.

Im the CEO of one of the Constituted Local Aboriginal Land Councils in NSW constituted by the Laws of NSW "NSW Aboriginal Land rights act 1983"

I have been ordered and directed to make corrections with wikipedia to correct the information and content pertain to WALBUNJA

I have attempted and tried to assist you with WALBUNJA Peoples correction of this content and information correctly and you are preventing us, but if possible can you confirm that you possess the power and the authority to to publish incorrect and fictional information about Walbunja people and the life they actually and effectively Live> who is that master who desirer the control of information in the name of Walbunja can you please tell us ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 10:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if we can not resolve our differences we will create our own Walbunja on Wikipedia by the actual people of Walbunja ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 10:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this way there will be no conflicts of interests other preperations have already been actived at Sate and federal levels to protect the word and name Walbunja ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 10:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I not being paid to do this, Im an Indigenous administrator of a Local Community of Walbunja in (English the town is called Moruya) in Dhurga the town is called "Pergoga" this is the words i and my people the Walbunja people speak each day as we have spoken for thousands of years before the arrival of the British and Europeans.

Im the CEO of one of the Constituted Local Aboriginal Land Councils in NSW constituted by the Laws of NSW "NSW Aboriginal Land rights act 1983"

I have been ordered and directed to make corrections with Wikipedia to correct the information and content pertain to WALBUNJA

I have attempted and tried to assist you with WALBUNJA Peoples correction of this content and information correctly and you are preventing us, but if possible can you confirm that you possess the power and the authority to to publish incorrect and fictional information about Walbunja people and the life they actually and effectively Live who is that master who desirer the controller of Walbunja information and content in the name of Walbunja on Wikipedia can you please tell us

if we can not resolve our differences we will create our own Walbunja on Wikipedia by the actual people of Walbunja this way there will be no conflicts of interests other preparations have already been activated at Sate and federal levels to protect the word and name Walbunja ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 10:19, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Your recent editing history at Walbunja shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. JarrahTree 10:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, ThePeopleWalbunja. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. TornadoLGS (talk) 20:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

whoa whoa

Before you revert anyone, or even make further comment, you gotta walk back to the problems that you have in hand, piece by piece and take a very slow and very careful way of looking at things...

Wikipedia is possibly not what you should be editing, from what I have read so far - but to overload your details, and to overload with reverting - we are not going to get anywhere...

we need to take it piece by piece if you have either the time of energy to go very slowly through things... JarrahTree 10:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, respectfully, generally you should consider standing for the democratic elections of the Parliament of the State of NSW whom absolutely, supremely by enforcedly, enacting Laws for the WALBUNJA Aboriginal Peoples (NSW Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983 No 43), among all other Aboriginal Peoples in the State of NSW, where personally to your hopes or expectation presumably that such as will revert to your very slowly, and carful way of looking at things, things such as the likes of the actula living Walbunja.

We can assure you and any "another" be it Wikipedia, Donald Trump or Anthony Albanese that do not actually live, the life of an Aboriginal particularly the general life of the Walbunja Peoples.

It is a personality and not by any fact a generality for another to accuse the actual Aboriginal persons of "Reverting" another into the world and life of an Aboriginal when such is naturally, constitutionally, and legally impossible by any effect.

This is not a personal engagement We very much stand, exist, speak, lead, represent, and embody the very Walbunja Aboriginal People you are suggesting should consider the "whoa whoa" realities and possibilities of not engaging, existing, standing, speaking and or leading the Walbunja Aboriginal People into the talk of overloading, reverting, piece by piece the incorrections and falsehoods of Walbunja, specifically when we live a completely inconsistent life to the very life editors transcribe on Wikipedia in the name and word Walbunja.

Likewise the Palestinians, they have a word and name generally existing in this website that describes and informs their existence in this world of editors of Wikipedia, yet they fail to accept reality when they can not explain the whole purpose of "ABORIGINAL" in any colonial society likewise "Palestine, Israel and Walbunja".

This is not a an "editing War" such behaviour is "negative personalities' which is and must be disregarded absolutely, our intentions was to achieve the serious fundamental attention of all editors who have contributed to Walbunja on Wikipedia, please do not mistaken or disregard us collectively, its clear now we have possibly achieved all editors serious fundamental attention to ensure a coherent and coexisting space and place where We the People of Walbunja can resolve some social, political, educational, journalistical, cultural, interlegible information and content about our very existence.

we stand ready to submit our territorial flag, territorial coat of arms, Walbunja's sovereign human embodiment Walbunja's Queen by fact and life,

we have everything, that anyone would see if the searched the word and name Botswana, or Britain or Australia. ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We want to work with all, we do not want to work alone, ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 15:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

we are pledge and accept that we will not undo anymore editings and or the removal and deletion of all our information we have edited into "Walbunja".

We accept that everything remains as you have edited it before our corrections, however strict conditions must exist that we all can agree to ensure the information and content is reflective and corrective of Walbunja reality, and we have all our evidence, information and content to share, we knew from the beginning that we would meet such challenges such as this, BUT AGAIN WE WANT TO WORK WITH EDITORS WE DO NOT WANT TO WORK ALONE ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ARMANA WALBUNJA

WE ARE WALBUNJA ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 15:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

we have thousands of Walbunja people who spell "Walbunja" as "Wulbunja" because it is how some and a proportion of Walbunja population that pronounce our Dhurga words primarily specific to where they actually reside and live or more ore less each community, indistinguishably, your edits do not reflect that reality, so respectfully, we offer our assistance and services for those corrections ThePeopleWalbunja (talk) 15:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who "we" is, but shared accounts are not allowed here]]. That's the least of the problems with this situation though. Your talk page comments indicate that you can't be contstructive here. Graham87 (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Graham87 (talk) 15:52, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]