User talk:TheNewSMG

Hello this is my talk page and plz don't add junk or mean threats.

Thank U!

Is the new material in the source?

In this edit can you confirm that you read the source and those pages back your addition? Doug Weller talk 20:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doug Weller, I found the Bahlol Khan information on a different site. TheNewSMG (talk) 20:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Doug Weller, I am not sure if this site is accurate for the Bahlol Khan information so please check if it is but I did read it carefully. But yes, I can confirm that the source that states the battle was indecisive can back my claim and I read it fully. TheNewSMG (talk) 20:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC) https://www.quora.com/Who-was-more-strong-individually-Akbar-or-Maharana-Pratap[reply]

But you added it to sourced text, so now it looks as though it's on those pages of the book. We never, never use Quora, again anyone can edit there. Doug Weller talk 20:29, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah your right, Quora is not reliable. I appologize for using it. TheNewSMG (talk) 20:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But the other source is accurate since it is from a reliable site. TheNewSMG (talk) 20:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Filter log

You may wish to be aware of this if it wasn't you. If it was you, you may wish to request oversight. Home Lander (talk) 19:37, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Home Lander, That was me, I forgot to sign in. TheNewSMG (talk) 19:43, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Home Lander, Just curious but how do you figure out the edit logs of users? Thanks. TheNewSMG (talk) 19:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just happened to spot it at Special:Abuselog; I noticed your username because I had just interacted with you earlier. Home Lander (talk) 19:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pooja Banerjee

Hi, I fail to understand how this edit done by me do not "appear constructive" to you. As per WP:BLP, unless birth date, place of residence and religion are not supported by credible sources, they are not retained. Social media links are also not normally added to Wiki page of a person. With the subject in question being an actor, only the IMDb link should suffice, or an official website if any. Thanks! Editor5454 (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor5454, your edit was not constructive because everywhere on the internet it clearly says the age. All you have to do is look up "pooja banerjee age" in the search and it will pop up. Thanks. TheNewSMG (talk) 17:27, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be new here. Something being "everywhere on the internet" does not mean you add anything and everything to an article. An article on Wiki needs content to be supported by credible sources. Please read WP:CS. Thanks! Editor5454 (talk) 17:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor5454, I know what your saying but any source that you find all state dob is November 8, 1991 so that means the information is correct because the sites are not connected and are reliable because they asked the celebrity their personal information. TheNewSMG (talk) 17:3p4, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

That these celebrity-gossip-websites are not reliable have been discussed and established. They are listed here. You can also find in that section the list of credible sources. Editor5454 (talk) 17:42, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editor5454: Sources:

www.bollysuperstar.com/pooja-banerjee-biography-wiki-age-height/
www.starsunfolded.com/pooja-banerjee/
www.filmyfolks.com/celebrity/tellywood/pooja-banerjee.php

These sources are reliable for celebrity information. TheNewSMG (talk) 17:43, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this matter should be discussed at Talk: Pooja Banerjee, not on my talk page. TheNewSMG (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove anything that I put before we reach a consensus. TheNewSMG (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:72.198.49.108

Please leave this talk page alone. The IP has been blocked for 3 months so there is no point in adding more warnings for things that happened before the block. He is allowed to remove comments and warnings from his page, so don't keep restoring them. Unless he changes the content of a warning or someone else's post just leave it alone, or makes a personal attack just leave it alone. Meters (talk) 18:04, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meters, That is what he keeps doing! He keeps changing the warning and threatens me and User:SahabAliwadia. TheNewSMG (talk) 18:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He is allowed to remove warnings. Do not restore them. And the new warning you added was inappropriate since it was for an edit that occurred before he was blocked. Just stay off the IP's page. Meters (talk) 18:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheNewSMG: You are right but I think it is now old thing. I think he has realized. SahabAli wadia 18:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. TheNewSMG (talk) 18:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, my mistake the original version of the warning was for the edit to his talk page after the block. Still, it's pointless to add a new warning that he may be blocked when he is already on a long-term block. Meters (talk) 18:23, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, TheNewSMG. You have new messages at Snowsleeping's talk page.
Message added 13:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Found one personal attack on your in his talk page. It is good that he is blocked indefinitely, but just to remind you. Thanks. SahabAli wadia 13:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SahabAliwadia, Thanks but I already know about the personal attack and reported before already. Oh and thanks for agreeing with my evidence on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Snowsleeping! TheNewSMG (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi. I've blocked you for abusing multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 04:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheNewSMG (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am very disappointed that the admins think I am the sock master of Snowsleeping. First of all, how is it obvious that I am the sock master?? My editing style is different, Snowsleeping can't speak proper English as seen in his edits, and the user does not sign his comments. And if I am the sock master why would I even play a good guy bad guy game? Does it even make sense? It is pointless and I don't think anyone would do something stupid like that. If you don't believe me you can have a check user check my IP. Thank you. TheNewSMG (talk) 14:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When there is definitive Checkuser evidence of linkage no admin will unblock based on denials. To have a hope of being unblocked you need to explain your relationship. Just Chilling (talk) 23:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: the checkuser results are real obvious; any other checkuser will discover the same results, and will be equally amused at the claims of innocence. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 20:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

jpgordon, so your saying that check users have checked the IPs of me and Snowsleeping and they match?? Now it all makes sense. The truth is that my cousin visited us on my 2 week vacation to Europe and I told him about my joining of Wikipedia. It was my cousin who created and operated Snowsleeping and the reason why he did this was to troll me and get us both blocked for fun. This explains why our IP's match. I suspected it was him after you blocked me so I asked him and he told me the truth. The vacation ended a week ago and my cousin has returned back to his location. I am requesting that you unblock this account because I promise Snowsleeping will never be operated. The reason why multiple IPs were used by both us is because we traveled to multiple hotels in Europe. Please unblock me and I apologize for whatever my cousin (Snowsleeping) did. 73.61.212.42 (talk) 02:51, 5 September 2017 (UTC) (My IP)[reply]