User talk:ThatGuamGuy

Welcome!

Hello, ThatGuamGuy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Deb 20:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Garth Ennis

I don't see the need for a separate entry for his 2000AD work and have proposed putting the information back into the main entry. (Emperor 21:06, 31 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

That entry has been put up for deletion so make sure you have your say too so a balanced judgement can be reached. I should take the opportunity to thank you for your contributions - they have been very useful. However, there are often ongoing efforts to improve pages and jumping straight in can result in changes that might have to be reversed. If you check the talk pages for Garth Ennis (and Alan Moore) you'll see me throwing in some thoughts on cleaning up the bibliographies and some of your changes run counter to this. If you have ideas for major reorganisations then it might be best to throw them in for discussion so we can plot the best course of action. Of course there is a balance between being bold and achieving a consensus to reduce wasted efforts it just takes time to get into the swing of it - I just wanted to note the overwhelmingly positive efforts and show a few ways to improve things (if that makes sense). (Emperor 02:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I'm sorry, the truth is, I haven't really figured out how the talk section works; I tried to check something which was said previously and it told me that the comment didn't exist ... so I haven't even seen any of the talk section (I did see one in the Woody Allen section, but the talk section was so crazy and threaded I couldn't take it). I do apologize, I've just been putting in some time while bored at work about stuff that I'd like to have definite information on ... I didn't realize I was making waves, I am sorry. Will fall back and look at what has been said. ThatGuamGuy 04:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Sean (TGG)[reply]

Hey, Emperor ... what's the policy on spoilers? I went into Hitman a few weeks ago and added all the issues which hadn't been collected yet. I was planning on going back and actually describing each arc, but I wasn't sure how in depth I was supposed to get with regard to spoilers ... especially when somebody dies. The thing is, it's difficult to describe subsequent issues without sorta spoiling that kind of thing anyway. You seem to know what you're doing, so I thought maybe you could advise me on that sort of thing. ThatGuamGuy 23:22, 3 June 2006 (UTC)sean[reply]

I can't really answer, but if you want an answer from Emperor, you should post it to his talk page. That way he'll be notified, since he may not think to check your specific talk page. By the way, excellent edit to Futurama; that article is quickly infesting with fancruft. Haakon 20:51, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Proposal

Hi, I am posting this message to everyone who has edited on animal rights or animal welfare related articles in the last couple of months. I have just created a proposal for a WikiProject to help co-ordinate editors on the many articles under the mentioned subjects. If you would like to find out about it or show your support for such a project, please visit User:Localzuk/Animal Rights Proposal and Wikipedia:WikiProject/List of proposed projects#WikiProject Animal Rights and Welfare. Cheers, Localzuk ^(talk) 10:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On the Derrida ref in the Seinfeld article

I reinserted it and put the reasons why in the Seinfeld discussion page. Folkform 12:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been invited to join a WikiProject

Hi, I've seen you frequently around the article Tenacious D and other related articles. Please consider joining Tenacious D WikiProject, an effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage and detail regarding Tenacious D.

If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks that you can help with. Thank you for your time.

Tenacious D Fans 11:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wee Bey Brice

OK I wont..Just that you add whatever you doing in the Edit Summary or else it would be regarded as Vandalism..Cheers..--Cometstyles 05:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wire

Noting your recent edits to The Wire related articles I wondered if you might have any thoughts about the reorganization of the character list into subarticles?--Opark 77 20:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Wire episodes

Noting that you edited List of The Wire episodes within the last few months I wonder if you have an opinion about the use of screenshots in this article and would welcome your opinion here if you have time.--Opark 77 22:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Wire episodes

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 18:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wire again

Hey again. Just read an edit summary where you were tidying up British spelling. You guessed correctly, I am indeed British and use original English spelling when I write. Glad to see its not just me working against merging the episode articles. Thank you for trimming the plot summaries, I originally wrote most of the ones I added as a personal resource so they are usually overlong.--Opark 77 10:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't be doing it if I didn't have such thorough summaries to work from. I try to simplify, even if it winds up slightly bending chronology, just in the interest of keeping things clear. I think that we (hopefully with the help of a few others) can make these articles worth keeping individualized.

Also, seperately, speaking as a writer and would-be director, I am appalled by the idea that individual episodes are not automatically considered acheivements. Directing an hour-long television episode is just as difficult as directing a two-hour movie, and usually the time constraints are greater. ThatGuamGuy 17:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)sean[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lords of the Razor

The article Lords of the Razor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article, no reason to believe this book is notable by our standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 04:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Retro-Pulp Tales

The article Retro-Pulp Tales has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References don't indicate that this book is notable by our standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 04:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ThatGuamGuy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Private Eye Action, as You Like It for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Private Eye Action, as You Like It is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Private Eye Action, as You Like It until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:33, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]