User talk:ThaddeusStevens
Ways to improve Edith Chapin
[edit]Hi, I'm Kudpung. ThaddeusStevens, thanks for creating Edith Chapin!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please clean up the naked URLs. See WP:CITE for instructions.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Statements of support
[edit]I saw your edit summary asking why every statement of support would require a quote. I think the answer would likely be to show that they are not bogus or misinterpreted. Such problems abound in articles about politicians and unsourced statements are likely to be questioned. FWIW. Donner60 (talk) 03:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
@Donner60: thanks so much for the message. The specific stance in question did have a citation; it seemed like it would be unnecessary to have a quote, saying the same thing, to supplement it. The general problem with the article I'm working on is that it was clearly edited extensively by the person in question, so it's been quite difficult to remove all the info that was seemingly added for his political benefit. ThaddeusStevens (talk) 03:08, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello, ThaddeusStevens,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nsk92 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Leland Pan, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click
Publish Changes
button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nsk92}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Nsk92 (talk) 11:07, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Chase Madar moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Chase Madar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Chase Madar
[edit] Hello, ThaddeusStevens. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chase Madar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen Wertheim
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Stephen Wertheim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Wertheim. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 19:15, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)