User talk:Tetianapronikova

December 2018

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Longhair\^talk 09:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tetianapronikova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

tetianapronikova (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I will use this account exclusively privetly, for my own purposes to share valuable content with Wikipedia readers. I have changed the user name. Hope for your understanding and reply.

Decline reason:

This does not explain your past conduct or indicate how your future conduct would differ if you were unblocked. Please also review WP:PAID and indicate your willingness to comply with the disclosure requirements. Huon (talk) 10:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have globally renamed Pettechnologies to Tetianapronikova, so the username part of the problem is now taken care of. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tetianapronikova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have chat via email with your support team and now have a clear understanding why the account has been blocked. The purpose of this article hasn´t been any promotion. I promise to delete all the links about the company in expertnal magazines or links to our pages in social networks. I had been convinced that vice versa these links were the proof of the information about the company. I would appreciate a lot if you provide me a list of all the modifications I have to make (and avoid the same mistakes furtherly) As I previously mentioned, it is my first experience with Wikipedia. Hope for your understanding!

Decline reason:

This unblock request is incoherent. You seem to think the problem is the links. That's not the case. You were violating WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO, and will not be unblocked to write about PET Technologies. Yamla (talk) 15:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tetianapronikova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the details you have provided. As I understand, do you paublish about the companies only on paid basis? I would appreciate a lot your explanation. Thanks!

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, and the fact that you seem to think you can pay to have an article included in Wikipedia is concerning in the extreme. You seem to think Wikipedia is some sort of business directory - it is not. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:14, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-Administrator-comment) No. We dont publish articles on companies only when we are paid therefore. We will write them, a) if the company is noteable, and b) if someone wants to do so. Also, as far as I know, 90% of Articles on companies are deleted because of Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertisements or the notabillity guideline. Furthermore, as you created an article here, that reads like an advertisement. Means: The text content of the article was barely an advertisement. And, as Yamla said above, your account will get a topic ban on that article in the case you were unblocked. We - nearly all Wikipedia editors I saw on my screen - do this in our rare free time. And that also means, that we create articles if we have the time therefore. My Tipp to all companies: If you are notable, and there are other sources than your companies' webpage, an article on you will appear earlier or later also here. Victor Schmidt (talk) 17:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tetianapronikova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Viktor! Thanks a lot for the explanation! Sorry for the delay with the reply. I was on sick leave. I would appreciate a lot if you consider PET Technologies as a potentional company to write about. You can find also information about PET Technologies included in Blow Molding Industry independent reports like https://dailyindustryupdates.com/33185/global-blow-molding-machines-market-2019-bekum-maschinen-fabriken-pet-technologies-meccanoplastica/ On the other hand, we could support you with the translation from English into other languages. Hope for your understanding and feedback)

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. You are not giving any indication that you understand the policies you have been informed of or that you intend to edit about anything other than your business, which will not be allowed. If you want to edit about another subject not related to your company in any way, you can use WP:UTRS to make a new request. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 15:36, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked due to WP:IDHT. --Yamla (talk) 13:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user engaged in block evasion as of December 2018. --Yamla (talk) 18:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]