User talk:Tanbiruzzaman

Question on Tinkle CSD script

Hi! I saw that you flagged my new article BiggerPockets for CSD. Was that a manual action based on your review? Or was it something in the Tinkle CSD module that flagged it? Asking because my new article is not substantially identical to the deleted version. I wrote the article from scratch, although you can see that I pulled the prior article from the deletion archives last month- it was basically worthless so I just started over. Nickgray (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Stephen Schneider (actor): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned.

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Crunch, crunch!

Here are some chips to go with your fish!

-- Wesoree ^{(talk·contribs)} 22:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merhaba

Çalışmayan linkler devlet yardımları siteme yönlendiriyorum anında iptal ediyorsun ayıp 85.105.111.61 (talk) 11:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Portlaoise Plane

Hi Tanbiruzzaman. Thanks for your message. My edit was genuine, not a test. There is much interest in the historic Portlaoise Plane consequently I listed my new book which tells the fascinating story of the search for a plane missing for over 50 years. Thank You. Downwind141 (talk) 09:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your interest/info

Hey I thought I’d just let you know that some edits you reverted recently (Special:Diff/1156945193) were the work of users under a sockpuppet investigation, and some of them have already been blocked. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2021Porto Final. Fork99 (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Legend Manqele (23:42, 10 June 2023)

Hi there, when will my article be published? --Legend Manqele (talk) 23:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Legend Manqele, welcome here. If you're talking about this, then click on Submit your draft for review!. Before submission, make sure you've completed the writing of the article. → Tanbiruzzaman 💬 06:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks a lot for dealing with that LTA on December 13! Appreciate it! -- Prodraxis ^talk _contribs 12:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Snuchie (08:24, 26 June 2023)

Hello. I'm new here. Before editing one must research a topic ? Why other articles are protected ? --Snuchie (talk) 08:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Your recent editing history at Salman Fazlur Rahman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your support on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Bangladesh-India border clash and Improving the Page of 2005 Bangladesh-India border clash. BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 13:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-attributed translations

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from bn:আওকরা মসজিদ to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. – DreamRimmer (talk) 11:29, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mila Nitich

Hi, please could you explain why you reverted my first edit to af:Mila Nitich here? Was it a mistake? TSventon (talk) 15:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TSventon, It's surely a mistake. I apologize for that. Returned to previous state, last version of you. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 15:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of errant template

Hi, please remove any template from your user sub page, User:Tanbiruzzaman/Gadget-PermissionOTRS.js, alerting this hidden category, Category:Pages with templates in the wrong namespace, as an error. Thanks! Intrisit (talk) 20:25, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

scn?

Hello, I'm italian, I live in Catania. Do you know sicilian? GiovanniPen (talk) 18:05, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @GiovanniPen, sorry for late reply. Not actually, I've zero knowledge of sicilian. Thanks for asking. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 22:37, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]