User talk:Steve tutty

Francis Doesburg

A tag has been placed on Francis Doesburg , requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. yandman 08:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 06:47, 9 November 2006

Northcote College

Please do not attack people, places, organizations, or communities, as you did in Northcote College. This is considered to be an act of vandalism, and further inappropriate editing will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 06:47, 9 November 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Birkenhead United. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. . You have already added this while logged out. Please don't do it again. riana_dzasta 06:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unblock-auto|1=219.89.32.24|2=repeated vandalism

You are not autoblocked. Your underlying IP has been blocked for repeated vandalism and personal attacks. Have a nice day. Yamaguchi先生 07:01, 9 November 2006

G.B.L

A tag has been placed on G.B.L, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Srpnor 09:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently re-created the article G.B.L, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:13, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently re-created the article G.B.L, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Srpnor 09:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grenslade cresent

A tag has been placed on Grenslade cresent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Srpnor 09:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is at least your third incarnation of the same page, all of which have been tagged for speedy deletion over and over (that is, the speedy tags have been continually replaced when you and your anonymous friend continually remove them against warnings). By now, you certainly know better, and you are wasting your time and our time. Please stop for a minute and consider that maybe there's a reason your articles are being deleted. Please stop recreating them and instead invest your time in reading something like Wikipedia:Notability or Wikipedia:Blocking policy. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as G.B.L, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GBL_Logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GBL_Logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

The recent edit you made to Arsenal F.C. constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks – Gurch 22:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Bill Hastings page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gimboid13 08:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Peluche.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Peluche.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]