User talk:Starcatcana

Welcome!

Hello, Starcatcana, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Dan Hubbert, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! E Wing (talk) 19:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dan Hubbert

A tag has been placed on Dan Hubbert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. E Wing (talk) 19:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All set. Good luck! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:58, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to Dan Hubbert. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 01:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Surf Break Entertainment

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Surf Break Entertainment, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Surf Break Entertainment seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Surf Break Entertainment, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 07:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to stop you recreating at any time, if you are working off-line, you should have the text, if not let me know and I'll sandbox it for you. The basic problem is that there are no independent verifiable sources in your article to support what you are saying or show that the company meets the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. Your keenness to get this article on Wikipedia suggests that you may have a personal interest and possibly might not be best placed to write a neutral encyclopaedic article. jimfbleak (talk) 07:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have to echo what jimfbleak stated above. Please see the talk pages for the Dan Hubbert and Surf Break Entertainment articles for my comments and suggestions for improvement to avoid deletion. -- Gmatsuda (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Power Music

A tag has been placed on Power Music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ninety:one 00:51, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: moving pages

Please note that copy & pasting a page to a different page name is not the proper way to move pages. When you copy & paste content, you are effectively removing the page history. Your copy & paste of Dan Hubbert and Daniel Hubbert has been undone. Please read WP:MOVE to learn how a page is properly moved prior to attempting to rename a page. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tamar Kaprelian

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jubilee♫clipman 06:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Dan Hubbert

I have nominated Dan Hubbert, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Hubbert. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 14:47, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:MeNMaGirls Main Photo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:MeNMaGirls Main Photo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:03, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]