User talk:Spindled

I liked your edit of hypochondria, thanks. Analytik 10:36, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-empty subset

I don't think that we need an article at non-empty subset. All that we can say about non-empty sets, is that they are sets which are not empty. Therefore, I replaced it with a redirect to empty set. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 04:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sound good to me. Spindled 04:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nullset.png

Could you possibly upload the SVG version of the image, please? Thanks. :) --Partymetroid 04:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:G16702.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:G16702.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 13:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Architect_ubuntu_white.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Architect_ubuntu_white.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 16:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Architect_ubuntu_black.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Architect_ubuntu_black.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 16:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo-fluxbuntu2_colorized.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Logo-fluxbuntu2_colorized.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 16:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo-fluxbuntu2.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Logo-fluxbuntu2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 16:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logo-fluxbuntu.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Logo-fluxbuntu.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bigr Tex 16:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review

Please be advised that I have recently conducted a review of the Rorschach test (formerly Rorschach inkblot test) talk page and archives. At some point, you have commented on the issue of the display and/or placement of the Rorschach inkblot image. Based on my understanding of your comment(s), I have placed you into one of three categories. I am issuing this note so that you can review how I have placed you, and to signal if this is an appropriate placement and/or to make known your current thoughts on this matter. You may either participate in discussion at the article talk page or leave a note at my talk page; but to keep things in one place, you should also clarify at Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review/addendum. Longer statements may be made here or quick clarifications/affirmations based on several pre-written statements can be made here. Best regards, –xeno^talk 15:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above, we would appreciate if you could briefly take the time to place yourself below one of the suggested statements here. If none of these statements represents your current position, please compose your own or simply sign "Not applicable" under "Other quick clarifications". Likewise sign as N/A if you do not want to participate further in this debate. If you choose not to respond then you will likely not be counted with respect to further consensus-determining efforts. –xeno^talk 14:50, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fblogo from svg.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fblogo from svg.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 04:40, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]