User talk:Soknaaramesh

April 2017

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to DoubleClick. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You changed appropriate links to an existing website so that they directed to a typo-jacked illegitimate website. This is completely inappropriate. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Bizjournals. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:38, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at DoubleClick. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]