User talk:Smeuuh

Unexplained deletion to Don Quixote

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from an article. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ronbo76 23:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Just check the last edit to the page :) --Smeuuh 13:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC) (and thanks for the condescending tone btw)[reply]

COI Editing Accusation: Request for a Public Apology

I request that the anonymous editor(s) who reverted my edits on the C0-semigroups page and falsely accused me of COI editing make a public apology. You are the only editor mentioned with whom I can make contact. If you cannot help me to resolve this issue, then I plan to submit a request for arbitration. While you disagreed with my inclusion of Proof Mining in the C0-semigroups page, the comment posted that is attributed to you did not make such a false accusation, so I respectfully request that if you know the editor(s) who participated anonymously in this defaming activity, then please reach out to them for me, and help me to convey to them my request for a public apology. If I must file a request for arbitration in order to obtain satisfaction, then I shall include you as a party in my request.

Matt Insall 18:11, 29 May 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Espresso-hound (talk • contribs)

Hi,

I do not know the people who made previous edits, and have zero desire in getting involved. Feel free to do what you feel is necessary, but please do not add the paragraph back again.

Smeuuh (talk) 08:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You got yourself involved by supporting their false accusation when you have no evidence to back up their claim and they have no evidence to back up their claim, and you are continuing to involve yourself by telling me to not add the paragraph back again. This is why you are named in the arbitration request that I submitted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Espresso-hound (talk • contribs) 14:36, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not support anything except my comments that the paragraph should be deleted and not added again. I do not accuse you of conflict of interest, but of repeatedly adding a paragraph that is not suitable for the article. Request what you want, but I would respectfully suggest that you move on. --Smeuuh (talk) 01:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]