User talk:Shaurya Singh Sikarwar

December 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gahmar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Do not change sourced content and edit war. If necessary, discuss and seek WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page per WP:BRD. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:47, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Discussion about whether Kam Dev was a bhumihar or a Rajput

,see Shaurya Singh Sikarwar, I know you probably is a desendants of Kam Dev, I belong to the Kamsar region, it was me only who created this page mad added information about Raja Kam Dev, who is the ansistor of both Sikarwar Rajputs and Kamsar Pathans,. I have researched a lot about him. I don't know who is the person, without an account who edit all the wrong information or rather revert my edits. But I would like to tell you, that there is a dispute among historians related to whether, Kam Dev was a Sikarwar Rajputs or a Sikarwar Bhumihar as per sanskrit gotra, available. Theditorial2.0 (talk) 09:54, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

I completely agree to you but we have the sources available but as you say it is disputed. I will not make any edits on it just wanted to say you can see in the original and first page Kam Dev is written as Sikarwar Rajput and I do not know anything about Sikarwar Bhumihar if you are the creator then you would know.

Though I am the descendan of Rao Dham Deo Singh Sikarwar. Shaurya Singh Sikarwar (talk) 18:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Actually in the common language, The people/ rather many families of Reotipur who call them Sikarwar Bhumihar, claim, that they are the desendants of Kam Dev and claim that he had titles "Misra". While Sikarwar Rajputs of Gahmar call them Sikarwar Rajput, of Gahmar from Dham Dev, Kam Dev's younger brother. So, it can be very easily observed that , actually real blood brothers can not have two different gotras. But still, may historians and even the desendants of Kam Dev, are in a kind of dispute. That's the very reason . Theditorial2.0 (talk) 18:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Do cheak https://en.m.wiki.x.io/wiki/Raja_Dham_Dev_Rao#Establishment_in_Ghazipur this link, here you may edit, information available to you! Theditorial2.0 (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

could you please put the ip adress of that user for block request Shaurya Singh Sikarwar (talk) 05:30, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

February 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Seasider53 (talk) 19:06, 17 February 2025 (UTC)