User talk:Sarah Archer
Sarah Archer, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi Sarah Archer!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
|
File permission problem with File:Sarah Archer.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Archer.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 23:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sarah Archer.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Sarah Archer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 04:46, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Some human touch
[edit]Please upload at Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository, not locally. Then your picture is reusable at different language Wikipedias which is a nice advantage.
If you are the photographer, you just have to
- include a free license disclaimer for this image at all external sites before uploading it here.
If not, you also have to
- get approval of the photographer about the license, and
- include the photographer name on all such disclaimers on external sites (if the license requires attribution).
- In such case having him/her upload is simpler; otherwise you have to go through the OTRS ticketing paperwork (it is not hard, but it takes time and effort).
--Gryllida (talk) 06:12, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. I noticed your article and restructured it slightly.
I have trouble verifying some things and left comments about it in the article... (We should convert the external links to inline citations once they're meaningful.)