User talk:Saibod
Better late than never; welcome!
[edit]| Welcome!
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing! If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page! Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:
Best of luck to you, and happy editing! |
Thanks for the warm reception :) - Saibod 10:40, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
R/QM
[edit]I was under the impression that the subject needed some direct addressing, rather than leaving it to a different article - and did my best to state the overall issue - as its often enough represented as a kind of dichotomy. Its fair enough to state the problem is focused on the issue of gravity, so if a better treatment is found at QG, then a plain redirect might be in order. IIRC some of it may have been broken off from another article, though IDRW. But I dont really have an interest in it, and I would defer the article to others more qualified. Regards, -Stevertigo 22:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Well then I leave it in your able hands. :) I appreciate the note though. Happy editing. -Stevertigo 22:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hello saibod, I am kinda new to wikipedia and I must say that your user page is very very impressive..... I copied some of your links and and used them on my user page. As I am new to wikipedia you will find my home page full of copy paste work:D Never the less I am learning from it :D Anyway..keep up the good work. Yourdeadin 09:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Yourdeadin
Got it
[edit]I was kinding reading the FAQ's and was looking at the Cheatsheet ;) The impressive page you said was ...by my standards too cluttered :p...Sour grapes! Thanks for the Userboxes .Lots of reading to do before I start editing !!! Thanks dear Yourdeadin 09:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)Yourdeadin
Ef
[edit]A tag has been placed on Ef (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Clicketyclack 11:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
[edit]
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I'm awarding you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. Wikidudeman (talk) 20:08, 29 July 2007 (UTC) |
Removal Of Warning
[edit]Hi, I was just woundering why you removed your warning from 81.109.6.186 's talk page? He has vandalised the page again, and there for I have issued him with a final warning. Just wounding if there is any reason why you feel I shoudant do this? Thanks! Tiddly Tom 22:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, well my warning seemed to be basically a duplicate of yours because it referred to the same edit by the user, that made on 22:31. So far my practice was to issue just a single warning for edits made within a short time span, but I guess that's just personal preference. - Saibod 23:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thats fine, and right. I thought you were refering to a diffrent edit of his. Tiddly Tom 10:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Neutrality tag
[edit]Hi
Can you please tag sections as POV-section rather than tagging the whole article as POV. If you do not have a link - here is one for you.
| Main namespace | |
|---|---|
| Other namespaces | |
| All namespaces | |
| Navboxes with templates |
|
| Inline images | |
| Help pages | |
| Related topics | |
| Search | |
I copied it to my userpage and that way I can quickly reference them. Chaosdruid (talk) 13:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
September 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Banff, Alberta do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 13:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Saibod. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Saibod. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Saibod. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)