User talk:Sabinbik22

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Orphaned non-free image File:Echelon (It's My Way).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Echelon (It's My Way).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sabinbik, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Azealia911 _talk 14:34, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your note on my talk page, in order to edit Wikipedia you need to have your main account unblocked. You cannot edit under any account of IP as long as that block stands. Instructions for requesting an unblock are included on your talk page in the orange block under the header "December 2014".--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:02, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me

@Ponyo: Can somebody unblock me? I really worked so much on this account I did articles and I planned more articles to do, I know I did a mistake, but I didn't know about this. Please give the second chance, because I planned so much to do on wikipedia. I won't do any account from now on, I didn't know was wrong. I didn't mean to be disrespectful with this, I didn't know... So please give me another chance, I deserve it... 151.18.208.115 (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, instructions for an unblock are included on your talk page. You will likely be held to the standard offer. Please stop pinging me here.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:38, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

where if not here? I'm not good with this, this is the first time and there's a lot of instructions to follow and I'm pretty confused 151.18.208.115 (talk) 23:01, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ponyo: Unblock me already, I'm so tired of waiting. I've been waiting almost 3 months and I can't take it anymore. There's still a lot of things I should do on here and I don't have that patience to wait 6 months for a minor mistake. It's really frustrating and I'm not willing to wait anymore. --Sabinbik22 (talk) 02:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The entire point of the Standard Offer is to ensure the blocked editor has the ability to follow guidelines and policies should they be allowed to return to the community to edit. Your demands prove the opposite is true in your case. Nothing is stopping you from posting an unblock request, however until they are WP:GAB compliant your chances are pretty poor.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HeyMama - David Guetta.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HeyMama - David Guetta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 09:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bombastic EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bombastic EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 22:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MØ - Bikini Daze EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MØ - Bikini Daze EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabinbik22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me, I didn't know making multiple articles was wrong. I always wanted to make good contributions to Wikipedia, and your block was an offence, because I always did useful contributions on here, such as Bombastic (Bonnie McKee EP), Water Me (song), Battle Cry (Angel Haze song), New York (Angel Haze song) and Million Dollar Girl (song). I did over 100 articles on Romanian Wikipedia, and 4 on Italian Wikipedia while I was blocked. Because I love to continute for wikipedia, and I'm asking for a chance just because I'm sorry for what I did, I never meant to break a rule.

Decline reason:

You clearly engaged in sockpuppetry. Please see WP:STANDARDOFFER.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:56, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Skip to the bottom

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabinbik22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Ponyo: Maybe I should've pay attention to the Wikipedia's rules, but I didn't, and now I regret it. But I'm doing this unblock request again because I understood my mistake and I won't make it happen again, I need a second chance, because I really love to work for Wikipedia. Sabinbik22 (talk) 02:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have not counted how many times you have been told to request an unblock on your original account, and that editing from any other account or IP address while that account is blocked is unacceptable. There is just a chance that you may have some good reason why you should ask for this account to be unblocked, rather than your original account, but if so you need to explain that reason. If I become aware that you have edited this page again without explaining why you think an exception should be made, I shall remove access to this page. I shall also remove talk page access if I become aware that yo have again pinged Ponyo, after being told to stop doing so, that you have made another unblock request that ignores what you were told about the Standard offer, that you have removed previous declined unblock requests again, or if you post any more unblock requests that in any other way ignore what you have been told in the past. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want to unblock this account, this is my original account. I don't want my prevoius account... You have to accept that OTHERWISE I KEEP EDITING ON ROMANIAN WIKIPEDIA, BUT I'M NOT GOING TO CHANGE THIS ACCOUNT FOR MY 'ORIGINAL' ACCOUNT, THIS ACCOUNT IS MY HOME THAT I WON'T CHANGE Sabinbik22 (talk) 14:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not your original account: it was created on 21 January 2015, while the earliest account that I know of was created on 7 March 2014. What is more, that earlier account was blocked when you created this account. Since you have now made it clear that you do not have any good reason for not requesting an unblock on your original account, I shall remove talk page access from this block-evading sockpuppet account. Since you have a history of evading your blocks by editing without logging in, I shall also protect this page against IP editing. What you do on Romanian Wikipedia is no concern of English Wikipedia. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sabinbik22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sabinbik22.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sabinbik22.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FKA twigs Water Me.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FKA twigs Water Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bonnie McKee EP.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bonnie McKee EP.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]