User talk:Ryulong/Archive 73
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ryulong. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 70 | Archive 71 | Archive 72 | Archive 73 | Archive 74 | Archive 75 | → | Archive 80 |
Hi there, can you create the route map for The Amazing Race Australia 2? It started almost 40 hours ago. ApprenticeFan work 01:43, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not the one making them because I don't have the program to. I usually ask a friend to make them in advance. I think we can wait a few weeks for some episodes to pass.—Ryulong (竜龙) 02:58, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Watchlist
Please take my talk page off your watchlist and stop stalking me. Thanks - Areaseven (talk) 02:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Your talk page was never on my watchlist nor am I stalking you. I left you a message regarding an error I found in your edits to several pages, notified you of it, and I went back to see how you responded to it. Clearly you are not following one of the central tenets of Wikipedia which is to always assume good faith.—Ryulong (竜龙) 02:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Where does "do not fucking reformat things I've written" fall under good faith? - Areaseven (talk) 03:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- You clearly decided that you should label a message I sent you ages ago with an uncivil addition that I never put there in the first place. It is a major faux pas to change the intent of someone's message, even if it is a section title, particularly because you automatically assumed that referring to someone's nationality (Filipino) is a racist remark. You failed to assume good faith in that situation last year, and the fact that you insisted in including that content on your page, shows you clearly did not assume good faith of my intentions. Therefore, I was blunt and to the point in how you were violating several rules and not following the general etiquette of this project. If you clearly did not assume good faith of me, then I should not treat you with any sort of the respect one should receive when they are editors who actually want people to work with them. I appreciate the work you put in to add episode summaries before Fractyl can make an abomination of the English language, even though he has been getting better, but being blunt and showing how you acted inappropriately in regards to the comments I made a year ago while also informing you of an unintentional error you have been perpetrating for the past week, which forced KenYokai, an editor who has no knowledge of the Japanese language and who feels an unending need to correct what he perceives as typographic errors stemming from his lack of knowledge from the language despite my unending requests that he stop correcting these "typos", to change every single instance of the name on Wikipedia because he thought the name was pronounced in one way, and was therefore supposed to be written in that same way. I am trying to be helpful, but when you're being unnecessarily rude to me I can't help but not be nice back.—Ryulong (竜龙) 03:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Do you mind editing your excessively long paragraph for everyone to read clearly? - Areaseven (talk) 03:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- No.—Ryulong (竜龙) 03:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ryulong, one thing I will say is that you've been handling things badly here. I'm astounded at how many edits you've been making to Areaseven's page. Why don't you move onto other things for a bit? WormTT(talk) 07:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Most of those edits have been twinkle things for image deletions.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- I know and I find it concerning that you've suddenly gone through and requested the deletion of many images created by someone you're in dispute with. Like I say, moving on for a bit would be a good idea here. At very least, please try and keep in mind how things look from the outside? Doing the right thing is only part of the battle, being seen to do the right thing is the rest. WormTT(talk) 09:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Areaseven did not create the images. They are fair use images that were orphaned and therefore they have to be listed for deletion. After I was done tagging, I removed the messages from Areaseven's talk page. And there is no dispute. It is merely a one-sided failure to assume good faith. I respect Areaseven's additions to the project. It is just the discourse between us has become terrible because Areaseven has been taking things out of context and blowing them out of proportion. I attempted to open up a new channel of discourse, but if Areaseven does not wish to respond so be it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, I can accept that. I've not dug into the situation that far, and I've no intention of going further. Thanks for the replies. WormTT(talk) 09:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Areaseven did not create the images. They are fair use images that were orphaned and therefore they have to be listed for deletion. After I was done tagging, I removed the messages from Areaseven's talk page. And there is no dispute. It is merely a one-sided failure to assume good faith. I respect Areaseven's additions to the project. It is just the discourse between us has become terrible because Areaseven has been taking things out of context and blowing them out of proportion. I attempted to open up a new channel of discourse, but if Areaseven does not wish to respond so be it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- I know and I find it concerning that you've suddenly gone through and requested the deletion of many images created by someone you're in dispute with. Like I say, moving on for a bit would be a good idea here. At very least, please try and keep in mind how things look from the outside? Doing the right thing is only part of the battle, being seen to do the right thing is the rest. WormTT(talk) 09:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Most of those edits have been twinkle things for image deletions.—Ryulong (竜龙) 09:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Ryulong, one thing I will say is that you've been handling things badly here. I'm astounded at how many edits you've been making to Areaseven's page. Why don't you move onto other things for a bit? WormTT(talk) 07:56, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- No.—Ryulong (竜龙) 03:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
- Where does "do not fucking reformat things I've written" fall under good faith? - Areaseven (talk) 03:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Pokémon Black and White
I'm still waiting for your opinion on the matter we discussed on my talk page. Thank you. Hula Hup (talk) 12:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- I thought that discussion was done with, except you keep coming up with shit that you think violates some policy because you're reading way too far into it.—Ryulong (竜龙) 19:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
BookWorm44 puppet
I just filed a SPI on a possible BookWorm44 sockpuppet. Looks like you had fun with them the last go around. So, you would be a better judge than I at determining if this is indeed another sockpuppet. Bgwhite (talk) 18:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
- I can't say I can be of much help this time around.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:41, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
激闘タチワキジム! VSホミカ!!(前編)(後編). ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 14:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well it technically is.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:08, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
A nod is as good as a winx
I am deleting these winx club copyvios cos there is no evidence of notability. But the stuff on Wikia has a CC-BY-SA licence so, strictly speaking, they are not copyvios. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:29, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- There's no admittance that they came from the Wikia so it's still technically a vio.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:56, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
IP editing musical articles
Aw, be nice... at least they're enthusiastic! :-)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Percussion >>> brass & woodwind.—Ryulong (竜龙) 23:02, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, couldn't keep my hands off the timpani at youth orchestra rehearsals.... :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 23:30, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Akuroma
May I ask from where did you get Akuroma's English name? ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 07:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- I assume that it had come up in some new official source that was out because every fansite seems to be reporting that fact. But it seems that I was incorrect. However, we should not be using "Akuroma" to refer to him anyway.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Apparently the name "Corless" has been found in press material showing "Roxie" and "Marlon" by means of the file name of Achroma's image.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:33, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I read it on some of the fansites but I looked into all the known sources including the official Pokemon website, Pokemon UK and even the press release website but didn't see anything, not even in the artwork names in the coding with the help of browser's developer mode. That is why I am wondering from where did they get that info. Here is the link to that press release website but it doesn't have a single image it seems, http://press.nintendo.com/articles.jsp?id=34106. Please let me know if you find anything, thank you. ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 09:26, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- I saw explicit file names mentioned somewhere.—Ryulong (竜龙) 10:53, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I read it on some of the fansites but I looked into all the known sources including the official Pokemon website, Pokemon UK and even the press release website but didn't see anything, not even in the artwork names in the coding with the help of browser's developer mode. That is why I am wondering from where did they get that info. Here is the link to that press release website but it doesn't have a single image it seems, http://press.nintendo.com/articles.jsp?id=34106. Please let me know if you find anything, thank you. ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 09:26, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
GloZell Green
I found and posted more GloZell Green reference material at the DRV. I'm looking forward to reading your expansion of that already well written biography. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 05:59, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
They sent it to DRV?It got deleted?—Ryulong (竜龙) 06:53, 30 June 2012 (UTC)