User talk:Ruben fdo

You had previously made these same changes[1] to Wealth and religion, just like you are doing now.[2] I urge you to read Wikipedia:SOCKLEGIT and Wikipedia:ILLEGIT. Stop using multiple IPs and accounts for making these contributions, and try discussing your changes on Talk:Wealth and religion. Bladesmulti (talk) 09:31, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feb - 2015

Your addition to Wealth and religion has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Bladesmulti (talk) 08:44, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Copyright violation and no communication. Bladesmulti (talk) 04:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you for a week for repeated copyright violations. You've been warned about this at least once and I can't see where you've read the warnings explaining why we cannot accept copyrighted material on Wikipedia. If you continue to post copyvio on Wikipedia after this block you run the risk of getting permanently blocked from editing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:09, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus

Hi, just to let you know that I have undone your edits to this article because, as you may have guessed, this is a highly controversial topic. If you wish for information to be added or changed, particularly in the lead paragraph, it is usually best to try and achieve consensus on the talk page first. Readards, JZ CL 14:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hinduism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hinduism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. The repeated addition of "another form of Paganism" to the lead is disruptive. At best, you can add a line within the article itself, but adding this to the lead is WP:UNDUE, WP:POV and WP:PLATFORM. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:09, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Paravar, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Sitush (talk) 09:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 20:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ruben fdo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have cited my edit with reference to that page.I don't understand why you block me in that case.Then you should be blocking all users from editing articles since they cite their reference.

Decline reason:

The last block I see was in November 2015 and it was only for 2 weeks, and I do not see any block on this account now. If you are still having problems, please make a new unblock request and tell us what message you get when you try to edit. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.