User talk:Redxx

Replaceable fair use Image:Gerard_McMahon_.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Gerard_McMahon_.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 04:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm new to all this and I confess I really don't understand. I want to put a photo of the artist on the page I have created. I thought I was doing right because I asked permission of the artist, told him what I wans doing and got sent this pic by his manager. Its a promo pic. I don't want to hassle them with legalities, insist they provide signed documentation, etc. I have access to various resources through doing extensive research, so could you please just tell me the simplest way of going about this so I can establish where I can get image from to use on this page. Thank you.

 _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 09:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for trying to get a picture on there. The problem is, it's not enough to have permission to use a copyrighted picture on Wikipedia. Rather, the picture has to be released to the public domain, or under a type of "free" license. In other words, you need permission to use it just about anywhere. There are more details at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. This is because Wikipedia wants to make sure other people can copy its content and use it in other ways. Another way to get a picture of an artist on a website is to take a picture of him or her yourself, and then release it under a free license yourself. It is indeed all rather complicated, so thanks for being patient. --Allen (talk) 18:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

You may find WP:COPYREQ helpful in how to ask people for a license for an image and what to do with the email permission if it is received. The standard boilerplate release on the page is all they really need to fill out and email. And yes, it really does work. MECU≈talk 19:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

thanks for making Gerard McMahon page

Good job making a page for Gerard McMahon. That was way overdue. I'd been meaning to do it for years and just never got around to it. (Sorry I had to delete the lyrics, though... we can't have them on there for copyright reasons.) --Allen (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I also deleted a reference to yourself as the author of the article... in my edit summary I mentioned WP:SELF, but then I realized that was wrong; WP:SELF doesn't say anything explicitly about not referring to article authors in articles. In fact, I'm not sure where to point you about that, but I am pretty sure we can't do it. --Allen (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your encouraging comments. I understand about making reference to myself as author. I just typed it, but I admit I thought better of it afterwards.

I was also half expecting lyrics wouldn't be accepted on here (shame), but if I got Gerard's manager (with whom I am in contact) to provide me with the GL licence thingy, could I post them then? I know they gave permission (probably informally) to someone to post them on YouTube. Also, I edit on LyricWiki. If I can post them there, why not here? There are also 100's of sites on the internet posting lyrics, so...?

I also saw a few notes amongst the edits for this page about 'unsourced' Whilst this did not result in the article being flagged (tho I would be interested to know why it didn't - lol), it did make me think more about this and further, that maybe this is something I should perhaps address. I guess the reason I didn't include more sources was because I am one of those that finds lots of 1, 2, 3, and 4's all over the page a bit tiresome and makes the page a little unreadable.

I'm unsure whether the picture is going to remain. I hope so, for I think it really adds interest to the page.

 _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 01:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, yes, if Gerard's people release his lyrics on GFDL (is that what you meant?) then you could post them here. If you can really do that, my hat is off to you. I don't know your connections, but if you didn't have a special in with Gerard, I would say don't hold your breath. They would be giving up forever their ability to make money exclusively on those lyrics. If they did that, and then I published a book of poetry that included those lyrics (properly sourced, of course), and the book made a billion dollars, they wouldn't get a penny of that, as I understand it. Not that lyrics often make a lot of money independently of their songs, but still, musicians' managers seem to like to maintain full control over them. Lyric sites that don't make a lot of money fall into a gray area of copyright law as far as I can tell; I've heard people make conflicting arguments about their legal status.

As for the unsourced thing, you should read WP:V, but here's how it works in my understanding: Eventually, everything on Wikipedia should be sourced. Right now, not everything is sourced, and that's okay, but... anyone can remove anything that's not sourced. If it's something bad about a living person, they can, and should, remove it right away. If it's benign, it's considered polite to flag it first (individual facts or whole pages can be flagged), then wait a few days, then remove it. But even benign unsourced things can be removed right away if someone wants to. The more something sounds like it's probably true and like it could be sourced, the more likely people are to let it stay for now.

Hope that helps! --Allen (talk) 03:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, indeed it does. Many thanks for your informative response.  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 07:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

References

Could someone please give me some indication as to the extent of references needed within an article, since I seem to have rather a lot...Gerard McMahon Thanks  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 00:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• As broad a scope as you can find is best. Most of the refs in Gerald McMahon seem to be All Music Guide and IMDb. I would suggest searching for anything you think is a reliable source -- online, print sources, whatever you can find. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 00:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you..but do you think I've got toooo many? If so exactly what do I NEED to reference, and what don't I? _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 00:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

• Hello there! Here's a list that should answer your question: Wikipedia:When to cite. Did it? Rayhou (talk) 16:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes Thank you! _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 18:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Cry Little Sister

Just a heads up, I responded to your comments at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 18#Active disagreement. Thanks. Equazcion •✗/C • 06:20, 29 Apr 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I will edit the page again when I have a bit more time.  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 11:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

{{Title override}}

Hi Redxx, sorry, I don't know of a way to get the template to automatically cope with changes such as the banner about steward elections. PhilKnight (talk) 20:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for prompt response Phil. It doesn't seem to lay over pagename properly does it? Pity. I wanted to use the code on LyricWiki.org (where I'm an admin) to assist users that dislike our pagenaming policy of all initial letters being capitalised. I know about DISPLAYTITLE magic word but that only works on first letter of page name. Aah well :(  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 20:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Article

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/The_Pebble_and_the_Penguin_(soundtrack) HannahMiley Talk.

???  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 19:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I just wanted you to fix the image thing like you did on the Thumbelina Soundtrack article because I didn't know how to. Thank You. HannahMiley, Talk.

Ahh ok. I did that for you without knowing. You were trying to do too much. You just need to enter the filename, like this: Picture.jpg Hope that helps! Happy editing!  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 02:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Hawk Nelson Is My Friend

Hi Redxx, I noticed that you recently moved the Hawk Nelson album article to "Hawk Nelson... Is My Friend!". I understand that is the album's more stylized title (on the cover), but I tend to disagree with your article move. Album articles are titled based on what the record label itself (on their website) and major reliable sources officially state the title as. "Hawk Nelson Is My Friend" is clearly the more official title, as numerous reliable sources confirm: BEC Recordings, Billboard, allmusic, Rolling Stone, Jesus Freak Hideout, Christian Music Today, etc. In this case, I think it'd be best to move the article back to its original title (which would require a WP:RM request), and have the lead line be something like this:

• Hawk Nelson Is My Friend, sometimes stylized as Hawk Nelson... Is My Friend!, is the third studio album from Christian rock band Hawk Nelson.

That's oftentimes how leads are written in these kinds of cases, so it mentions the real and more generic title, as well as the "stylized" one. That also helps with the common search term not always having to be a redirect to another title. Best, Jamie^☆S93 20:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok I always take the album name on the album cover to be correct. I am an admin on LyricWiki.org and that is how we decide things. It is usually definitive. But if you want to do as suggested that is fine by me. Thanks for putting me straight on the procedures round here. Regards  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 21:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem, happy to explain things! :) I'll get the article moved back now, cheers, Jamie^☆S93 22:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Thin Lizzy

I see you moved Nightlife (Thin Lizzy album) to Night Life (Thin Lizzy album) with no discussion. Regardless of what the CD might say, the album cover very clearly says "Nightlife", so can you revert your change please, thanks. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:40, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes the front of the cover is stylized "Nightlife" but the sides and back (and the song) all very clearly say "Night Life". I had to reduce the size, but I hope you will be able to see that from the two covers I have uploaded:

• cover1  
• cover2

I don't spend much time editing on here. I tried it and it wasn't for me. I just correct errors I find along the way. So if you want to decide the album is Nightlife, then by all means revert my edit.  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 21:30, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Those are reissue CDs, and the original album does state "Nightlife". The song itself is always written as "Night Life" though. A number of book sources also call it "Nightlife", including the recent Alan Byrne book. It's not really a question of "what I want to decide" - that's what it's called. I'll revert it with an explanatory note in the article. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:28, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Ok thanks. Sorry for moving. I just wanted it to be right.  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 23:41, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey, no problem :) You're clearly a good-faith editor and it's a fairly unclear thing. I thought your other Thin Lizzy-related edits were very sound and helpful. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm one of the 18 administrators over at LyricWiki so my edits are always music related. Have a good Sunday!  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 14:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC) P.S. Thin Lizzy

To know my other edits were correct, you clearly know much about Thin Lizzy. With this in mind I have a question that I'm hoping you might be able to answer: the song "Dedication", is it a Thin Lizzy song, or Grand Slam?

It appears on the special 2 disc version of Live 1984 and of course on Dedication: The Very Best of Thin Lizzy. However on the Dedication album page it says "reconstructed after Phil Lynott's death". As such the song on Dedication can be attributed to Thin Lizzy (without Lynott) but the 1984 song...? The original song?

I also note that it was co-written by Laurence Archer correction required against some of those tracks perhaps?, a member of Grand Slam who was never in Thin Lizzy.  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 03:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, an interesting situation! Originally, "Dedication" was a demo written by Archer for Grand Slam, though it was only ever a very rough demo. The song was basically forgotten until about 1990 when the idea came up to do a tribute song for the fifth anniversary of Lynott's death. The demo was discovered and the vocal was kept, but the music was re-recorded by Gorham and Downey, and released as a Thin Lizzy song. Some people questioned that, and that maybe it should just have been a Phil Lynott release - I know Brian Robertson was a bit sore about it. So there wasn't really an original recording, and it wasn't a Thin Lizzy song at all until the 1991 release. As for the writing credit, it was definitely written by Archer, but it is credited everywhere to Lynott... so that's pretty much what we have to put in the articles. I am not sure, but Archer did sign away the rights to some Grand Slam songs - I don't know if "Dedication" was one of them. It makes me think the song might need an article of its own... Cheers! Bretonbanquet (talk) 11:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. I appreciate that. If I have any more questions I know who to ask ;) And yes, considering the song pages on here which aren't half as interesting, and the song's history, I definitely think that it deserves its own page.  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 14:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

I'll add it to my "to do" list ;) Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:54, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

And this too... Live 1984 (It's got a nice "Grand Slam" cover) ;)  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 18:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Is that this one? It needs the cover to be added! Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes that's the one. I have another question for you...

"Cowgirl" or "Cowgirl's" Song? It doesn't help much that on the Vertigo reissue cover for Live and Dangerous it's "Cowgirl's" but on the Mercury release it is listed as "Cowgirl".  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 03:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Certainly originally, it was "Cowgirl's Song", only ever as part of the "Rosalie / Cowgirl's Song" medley. I've never seen it written as "Cowgirl Song" so maybe it's either a mistake or some irritating revisionist thing. All my copies of Live and Dangerous say "Cowgirl's Song" :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 07:03, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. "Originally" will do for me ;)  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 15:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Finally, do you know anything at all about this song?  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 16:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Haha, it's an unreleased song - it's from the Black Rose sessions, so it's Lynott, Downey, Gorham and Moore. I've seen it titled as "Rockula" and "Rock your Love" as well, but since it was never actually released, it's hard to tell. I have it somewhere but the sound quality is awful, and it's a bit of a throwaway song. There's a slightly better song, "Hate", from the same sessions, and one called "Cold Black Night". At those sessions they also did versions of Parisienne Walkways, Spanish Guitar, Ode to a Black Man, Blackmail (Wild Horses song) and different versions of some of the Black Rose tracks. Any more questions, let me know!! I like them :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Rfl. Friend request coming to you via lastfm...I knew I'd seen the name somewhere ;). Thanks a bunch for solving that little mystery. I managed to allocate every song to a release that was on our Thin Lizzy page apart from that one, and I'm pretty good at research too, so it was very frustrating. Some people have simply tagged it as being entitled "Thin Lizzy". Thanks a lot for all the help. I really appreciate it :-)  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 17:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

No problem ;) I pick up a lot of info from bootlegs and from the Lizzy biographies. And thanks for the friend request - you have good taste! Bretonbanquet (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Well you sure know your stuff! Fully expect for me to bother you again when I get stuck ;) (I wish I could substitute my signature on here lol - apologies)  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 18:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

User page changes

Hi, you noticed my user page a month ago, and I've only just noticed!!! I suddenly thought, "this looks less jumbled than it did..." and checked the page history, and hey presto, there was your edit! Many, many, many thanks for that. Yes, many is written three times - it would have been "many, many" originally, but the third is a "late" pressie... :P Dave (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Hee hee You're most welcome. Glad to be of service :-)  _♫ Яєd_{xx ♪}♫♪_♫♪^Talk 04:19, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Thin Lizzy - Night Life (Back).jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thin Lizzy - Night Life (Back).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 06:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tonite-lets-all-make-love-in-london.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tonite-lets-all-make-love-in-london.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:37, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

blip.fm

ne, redxx, why are you still in love with last.fm when I'm pretty sure you or one of your friends introduced me to blip.fm long time no see, btw. ~sscout —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sscout (talk • contribs) 20:14, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Let There Be Drums (disambiguation)

The article Let There Be Drums (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is now an unnecessary dab page - one entry was deleted at afd; and now redirects to the only other article. the other entry (a song lyric) shouldn't have been here in the first place

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 06:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Immortal (front).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Immortal (front).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:G Tom Mac - Thou Shalt Not Fall (front).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:G Tom Mac - Thou Shalt Not Fall (front).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Various Artists - Tonite Let's All Make Love in London..jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Various Artists - Tonite Let's All Make Love in London..jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 10 November 2022 (UTC)