Jump to content

User talk:R0paire-wiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to the drive!

[edit]

Welcome, welcome, welcome R0paire-wiki! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:54, 1 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin McCaughey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galbally.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

[edit]
Thank you for helping fight the 1949 West German federal election vandal yesterday! Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 05:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Please bring the Western Chalukya Empire page to stable version without any casteist claims as vandalized by anonymous users 1.22.220.98 (talk) 09:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Restroing

[edit]

Hi, I have restored the Pallava dynasty page to a stable version which was vandaised by anonymous users, who tried to push their caste in the page Karnandus (talk) 10:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improper Reversals

[edit]

Hello,

While I see no indication of it being in bad faith, you have twice reversed my edits without just cause. In the first place, the fact of a marriage between Abelard and d'Argentfuil renders "wife" more proper than "lover." As to the other issue, I did, in fact, provide two sources. One was from a Rabbi and professor. The other from a well-respected Calvinist ministry. Both agree with the "dedication" view as opposed to a sacrifice. Both are proper in this circumstance. Why does this article describe the latter as the main opinion? I can find a reference in a source that it is supposedly the majority view in history, but it doesn't actually list any commentators and the author himself disagrees with the notion. Lastly, you reversed even the minor style changes I made (adding first names to make it uniform). Why did you do this? You appear to be using some sort of program. Was it unintentional? Shouldn't you check each item individually rather than erase everything? Thank you,


TanRabbitry (talk) 18:18, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The second source you cited is not WP:RS and the first source requires attribution (e.g; "X in an article for Y stated...") alongside citing the source. The article for Héloïse states it was a "love affair" with a cited source to support it, so I'm more inclined to support that then an uncited wife edit.
The sacrifice mention also has an existing citation for it. I would create a discussion on the talk page regarding that change as it may be disputed due to the existing source.
Yes the reverts were done with a tool, and yes they were intentional for the aforementioned reasons. R0paire-wiki (talk) 18:32, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cease and desist defaming me please

[edit]

Dear Roparire-wiki

You keep writing on the Wikipedia page about me that I was "found" to have lied and that I said "pedophile rings" were operating in the Northern Territory. Neither of these things are true and there is no evidence to support these claims. They are false and defamatory and this misinformation has on numerous occasions caused harm to me - including threats of violence based on hatred of mye by individuals who I do not know and who have read this misinformation. I was alleged to have lied by the former NT Chief Minister who was later forced to resign as a result of her misinformation and lack of action in relation to child abuse and neglect. The NT Treasurer made the same allegations. They were not "findings". The funding from the Independent Complaints Panel about the evidence that I gave on the ABC Lateline program was that I was a credible witness. There have never been finding that I lied. There have only be allegations. The findings were that I told the truth along with th other witnesses. Similarly, I have never used the term pedophile rings to describe what was happening. A Minister did. But not me. This is again, false and defamatory. Please cease and desist immediate. Respectfully, Gregory Andrews GregoryWAndrews (talk) 23:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits to the article have reliable sources support them, so there really isn't a valid reason for removal unless you have reliable sources stating the contrary.

You have yet to actually provide any reliable sources that absolve you of what is detailed in the article. The coroners report only makes a single general remark about your work which is far too broad to be construed as "his evidence wasn't false"; and the links to your website both fail WP:RS and don't actually support what you claim with them, and weirdly aren't available directly from the organisations that they are purported to come from.

You may not like what the article states, but it is neither false or defamatory if it is supported by reliable sources.

You have also been notified several times across a number of accounts and IPs that your WP:COI means you should not edit the article about you for the sake of neutrality. You can suggest edits via the talk page, but your edits thus far should inability to follow WP:NPOV.

If you are dead-set on 'rectifying' what you consider "false", I would suggest getting these news and media sources to publish their findings absolving you themselves or via wayback machine. R0paire-wiki (talk) 00:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Independent panel's findings reference me as a credible witness and make no allegations or findings that I lied. I have given you this already. If you don't cease and desist I will pursue this through legal channels. Here is the link once more:
https://web.archive.org/web/20080806111511/https:/www.abc.net.au/corp/pubs/documents/feb_23_08_mutitjulu_final_report.pdf GregoryWAndrews (talk) 01:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is the type of sources I was referring to being WP:RS - however that particular source makes no reference to what you claim it does.
Also legal threats are prohibited on Wikipedia, see WP:LEGAL. R0paire-wiki (talk) 08:11, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Sloan - Please make a change to my bio?

[edit]

Hello-this is Michael Sloan. Could you please make a change to my biography? The last sentence should read: “Michael is a member of PEN America, the Lute Society of America, and the Society of Illustrators.“ I would like to remove the part that mentions that I was a member of a Pulitzer prize jury since it turns out that that information should be confidential and not released to the public. Thank you! 38.126.98.218 (talk) 15:42, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed it, though do note that it was sourced from their website (you can find the links to the website pages in article history) so you may want to contact them about that also. Very welcome. R0paire-wiki (talk) 16:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stacey Abrams

[edit]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/29/stacey-abramss-rhetorical-twist-being-an-election-denier/ Stacey Abrams source — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freespeech2024 (talkcontribs) 03:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite that source and write about it in the section you are editing the name of. The change looks uncited otherwise. R0paire-wiki (talk) 03:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-41

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-42

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:18, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert not justified

[edit]

Revert my edit on Kliment Red'ko back. "WP:MOS for historical names" is not a justifiable cause here. Kyiv citizen (talk) 04:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

J10 page

[edit]

Hi there,

I have replied to your message on the J-10 page due to your revert of my edit.

Please check and assist.

Thanks. 2A00:23C5:CDA5:EC01:CCE7:4A4:5BB5:E6CB (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-43

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]