User talk:Pietrow

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pietrow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Literaturegeek | T@1k? 19:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, if a bit dated :) Pietrow ☏ 20:05, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Chettikulangara Bharani

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Chettikulangara Bharani, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jeevanam.com/html/jev_atrct.html & http://www.chettikulangara.org/html/chtkgra_kuthiyottam_01.html. As a copyright violation, Chettikulangara Bharani appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Chettikulangara Bharani has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Chettikulangara Bharani and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Chettikulangara Bharani with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Chettikulangara Bharani.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 16:23, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, I'm not a major contributor. I just rewrote a sentence. Pietrow ☏ 17:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:01, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Pietrow ☏ 10:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Review for Stephen_Colbert

Hi Pietrow, the revision you accepted for Stephen Colbert was vandalism although it was not obvious, refer to WP:VAN for more info on how to deal with and spot vandalism, I've warned the user of that IP already.

Thanks, Fridae'§Doom | Talk to me 08:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm sorry. I should have left it to someone more familiar with the subject I guess. — Pietrow ☏ 08:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Science Fiction Edit

Hi there. You asked why I removed Stephanie Meyer as an example of a Fantasy author who has won a Hugo--I removed her because she has never in fact won a Hugo. I'm not familiar with how Wikipedia works, but was under the impression that simple edits of this nature were not only allowed but encouraged. For future reference where should I have explained the reason for the edit?68.144.103.171 (talk) 11:37, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand the reasoning, therefore I reverted your edit. It's not required to give a reason for edits, but sometimes it's useful so people can understand and if required verify it. That's especially the case when removing content as an anonymous user, because such edits can be mistaken for vandalism. Often I forget to give an edit summary myself, so don't worry about it. Your contributions are more than welcome. — Pietrow ☏ 13:08, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of symbolic computation with computer algebra system

You may be interested in Talk:Symbolic computation#Merger with computer algebra system. Yaris678 (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]