User talk:Pianoplonkers/Archive 1

My Userpage	Questions? Comments? Advice? Talk to me	My Contributions	View my experiment edits here	Thank you
Userpage	Talk	Contributions	Sandboxes	Awards

This is an archive for User:Pianoplonkers from the 21^st June 2009 - 22^nd September 2009. Please post any new comments on my current talk page

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Pianoplonkers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Referances

Please provide references to your article or it might get deleted. Thank you.Calaka (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That is looking like a great article now! Hope you continue to contribute in such a productive manner! Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 09:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

- Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reastablishing Steinway Model D-274 if it is improved

{{helpme}} Recentely the page Steinway Model D-274's content was removed. I am writing to ask if I could reastablish this page, after some major editing and including referances ect.

The content must be notable. Yes, you can add it by editing more and adding references. Please see below to understand the topics in a nutshell.

Reliable References/Reliable Sources: Information on wikipedia should be based on a reliable published source and the articles should be based on third party resources i.e. not created by me or you, but by someone else. The material must be based on some information published by a famous publisher. The sources must be related to the topic. If an article has no reliable sources in it, it must not be in wikipedia. The word “published” mainly means by text, audio, pictures and videos should be published as well as broadcasted on a larger public. So, the youtube videos should have been viewed by as least 500 people. It is better to check if an archived copy of that video exists. You tube videos have archives, no need to worry. Wikipedia’s sources must mainly rely on scholarly articles. The following points can be noted. (1)The sources are reviewed an not out-dated. (2) There must be not other contradicting sources. Another best kinds of sources are newspapers. In India, best for citing, is the Times Of India. Other newspapers also apply. Self published sources are suggested not to be used but can be used at some extent when you are an expert and the source has nothing to do with you and doesn’t show anything personal about you. It is the best to use tertiary sources like Encyclopedia, textbooks, etc. except for wikipedia. Secondary sources can also be used like websites, etc. Blogs are not accepted. Please use {{fact}} when you what to insert ^{[Citation Needed]}.
Notability: It is generally possible for an article to stay on wikipedia if it has enough sources and independent of subject. E.g. XYZ is a dog specie which doesn’t have enough sources. Then XYZ can be included in the Dog’s article itself under proper context. There should be a significant coverage about the topic, not that you wrote just one line about it! It should have reliable sources (explained above). It should be independent of the subject. E.g. Mango seed structure doesn’t need an extra article page. It can be merged to Mango. The article must not contain definitions, your own thoughts, advertisements, extreme external links, memorials, blogs, manuals, guides, and unexpected “going to happen” events. Please don’t add content as a news report. Articles not having notability are deleted. Once we cross the notability stage of editing an article, we will move on to developing an article. --Srin ivas 10:08, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)

Anyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, of course, but in light of the background to this, I advise caution; it might be a good idea to first make the 'proposed article' in your own user space, and ask others to check it before making it live.

Therefore, I suggest you make it as User:Pianoplonkers/Steinway Model D-274. That is not in the live area, so you can make that page, work on it, and try to make an appropriate Wikipedia article.

In order to have an article on Wikipedia, the subject must meet the notability guidelines. The simplest, most important one is the general notability guideline, which says a subject needs significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. That carefully-worded phrase explains quite a lot;

Significant coverage - such as, a number of news articles about the article topic - not passing mentions

Reliable sources - well, this is defined in some detail in WP:RS, but the essence of it is - something that is generally trusted - such as the BBC, CNN, The New York Times. Books are good, too. Blog-sites are rarely reliable.

Independent - we don't use primary sources, such as the persons own website, or their publishers/labels website, or anything like that. We avoid press-releases. We want secondary coverage - other people independently writing about the subject.

The previous incarnation of the article lacked such independent sources. That is why I suggest you get the article checked over before moving it to the live area. To get someone to check it, or uf you have questions, please ask for help - either with a further 'helpme', or talk to us live, with this or this. Chzz ► 10:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted due to notability problems. See discussion here. --Karljoos (talk) 10:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Royal 'we'?

Hello there.

That article, User:Pianoplonkers/Steinway Model D-274, seems to be shaping up well; I'm glad to see that you're trying to find good sources for the info. Great work; give us a shout when you want it checking over.

I have another issue that needs discussion; I'm a bit concerned that this account is being used by more than one person, based on your use of the word 'We' on your user page.

Wikipedia accounts must be individual - each person takes responsibility for their own edits, and contributions are logged to the individual (part of the terms of the Creative Commons licence).

If more than one person has access to this account, please get each person to sign up for their own account, and then change the password to something that only you know.

If, on the other hand, I have it all wrong, then I apologize; I hope that you can understand my reason for asking - ie to avoid problems in the future.

As with everything, ask for help if you need to. Best wishes, Chzz ► 11:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Between us we have decided that we will split up and my partener will make a new account. Can we use pianoplonkers talk page on the new account because it is theirs as well?---Pianoplonkers (talk) 17:06, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Each user has their own user page. They could copy yours, but instead I would recommend that they put a message on their user page, such as "I am a partner of User:Pianoplonkers; please see that page to see the articles I'm working on" (or something like that). Chzz ► 17:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I kindly ask you to read Sock puppetry (remind your previous blocking for sock puppetry).--Karljoos (talk) 17:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Borodin's Scherzo

Hi there. It's great you will start an article about Borodin's A flat Scherzo. Just remember that the name of articles about compositions should be like this--> Ballade No. 2 (Chopin) or Symphony No. 5 (Beethoven). Please visit Naming conventions, Manual of style (music) and Project Classical music. Thank you for your contributions. --Karljoos (talk) 16:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It should be "Scherzo in A-flat major/minor(Borodin)".--Karljoos (talk) 15:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is "A-flat major" not "Major". Read Manual of style (accidentals)--Karljoos (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User pages

Do not change redirects to point to your user pages, such as you did here, here and here. Binksternet (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monti's Czárdás

Ha! I can't believe we didn't have that article! Very suprising for me, given the fame of that piece. Thanks. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll try to help you. --Vejvančický (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure with that section, Czardas was published many times, but I think the main arrangements should be included, for the benefit of our readers. I'll try to find also some free recordings. Unfortunately I have a limited Internet connection from where I am, I can search only at Wikipedia now.--Vejvančický (talk) 13:19, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this should be the correct number. The edition number is usually placed on the bottom of each page in the sheet music. --Vejvančický (talk) 11:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

{{helpme}} I was reading about sandboxes but did not understand what they were. I was wondering is you could explain this to me in simpler english and vocabulary.--Pianoplonkers (talk) 17:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. A 'sandbox' is a working area, somewhere you can test things out before making things live. There are some sandboxes that anyone can edit, see WP:SANDBOX - but that doesn't help much for developing your own things, as people change the content every few minutes.

Therefore, it is a good idea to make your own user subpages, and the easiest way to do it is this; edit your user page (not your user talk page), ie User:Pianoplonkers, and add some lines like this;

* [[User:Pianoplonkers/my sandbox]]
* [[User:Pianoplonkers/another sandbox]]
* [[User:Pianoplonkers/test1]]
* [[User:Pianoplonkers/test2]]
* [[User:Pianoplonkers/test3]]
* [[User:Pianoplonkers/Something else]]

Of course, the names can be anything you like. If you do that, they will all be red links, because they don't exist - but you can click on them and make the pages. Having the links there, on your user page, makes it easy to get back to them, by just clicking your user name at the very top of the screen. You can develop articles there, or simply try things out - and of course other people could 'see' the pages, so you could get help with them too. If you do create an article, it can be moved over to the live area once it is ready.

I hope that helps; let me know if you're still puzzled about it. Chzz ► 17:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Glad to see you are settling in Wikipedia very well. When you are free, you might also want to have a look at User:Skysmith/Missing_topics_about_Music as that seems to be a very comprehensive list of missing articles in relation to music and there might be some specific ones that interest you to create. Kind regards.Calaka (talk) 13:47, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I hope it all works out.Calaka (talk) 03:10, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Pianoplonkers. I hope you can get your article on Liszt's Gallop Russe up and running.--Egemont (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

I have created a userbox but would like to shorten the code.

From:

{{Userbox |#D2B48C|#D2B48C |[[Image:Musica clasicismo.png|51px]] |This user is a member of the '''Romantic Music task force''' of [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical Music|WikiProject Classical Music]].'}}

to:

How would I go about doing this? --Pianoplonkers (talk) 18:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Start a template, i.e. Template:User WP Romantic, and place the code for the userbox there. Then all you need to do is transclude the box to your userpage by placing {{User WP Romantic}} on your userpage. For example, Template:User WP Anarchism has its code, and when I write {{User WP Anarchism}}, the following shows up:

This user is a member of the
Anarchism WikiProject.

Hope this helps, Skomorokh 18:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Userbox

I have created a new userbox which I prefer, here it is:
{{User WP Romantic music}}

--Etincelles (talk) 21:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please See Page

Hello Pianoplonkers. Please have a look at Three German Dances (Mozart) for me, and tell me what you think. Thanks.Egemont (talk) 19:21, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

Good idea Pianoplokers, especially with your quantity of userboxes! I don't think that I shall use them on my page, but I could incorporate the code into ont of my future pages. Thanks for the thought.--Egemont (talk) 19:04, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page

{{helpme}}

Whenever I want to communicate with Etincelles and Egemont, I have to send them separate messages. Would it be possible to set up a talk page between the three of us so that we didn't have to make copies of the message? Would it also be possible for it to alert us when messages were posted on it like on our personal user pages? Thanks --Pianoplonkers (talk) 15:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused as to what you mean by "partner" accounts. I'll assume good faith in that they are all operated by separate people.

In regards to your question, you may have a couple of options. For example, you can just agree that all discussions will be at one of your user talk pages (i. e. All discussions between the three of you are on this page) or one of you can set up a subpage (i. e. User talk:Pianoplonkers/Partners or something similar). Mm40 (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can also use the {{talkback}} template to alert each other that there is a new message. Matthewedwards : Chat 17:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

Hello Pianoplokers. I have created a new potential userbox for WikiProject Haydn and Mozart from your previous one, but as a template. Do you think I should use it, or that we should leave the prject without a userbox? (Please click here to view template.). Also, how do I create a userbox that shows the number of edits that one has done?--Egemont (talk) 16:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]