User talk:Panic Reaper

Help again

Hi Panic Reaper!!! can you help me to add the contents of the article You're Insane in the sections of background and music video? Thank you. -Zuagery (talk) 14:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC+07:00)

Help

Hi Panic Reaper!!! can you help me to add an image to this page Ungrateful? because my account is blocked until 10 april in wikimedia commons and I can't upload an image. Thank you. -Zuagery (talk) 10:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC+07:00)

Yeah of course man, no problem. Panic Reaper (talk) 21:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Your addition to Criminal Minds (season 6) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Episode summaries copied word-for-word from TV Guide: http://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/criminal-minds/videos-season-6/192244 Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:48, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aron Erlichman with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -down load ׀ sign! 19:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Hollywood Undead (New Masks2011).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hollywood Undead (New Masks2011).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:28, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Craig mabbit taking a pic.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Craig mabbit taking a pic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fixer23 (talk) 00:09, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hollywood undead new masks for american tragedy.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hollywood undead new masks for american tragedy.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fixer23 (talk) 00:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hollywood Undead (American Tragedy Masks).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hollywood Undead (American Tragedy Masks).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Danny at Rock on the Range.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Danny at Rock on the Range.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Get scared.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Get scared.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:08, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from File:Danny at Rock on the Range.jpg with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 19:11, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Best kind of mess.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Best kind of mess.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Get scareddd.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Get scareddd.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:09, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Get scaredx.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Get scaredx.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 20:12, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Panic Reaper. You have new messages at File talk:Get scaredx.jpg.
Message added 20:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 20:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Get scareddd.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Get scareddd.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 19:03, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Get scareddd.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Get scareddd.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:45, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hello Edwin, thank you for helping with the Deuce page. I'm new to Wiki editing and value your help. If you'd like to address anything or talk to me personally about anything, you can email me at trueblue9lives@gmail.com. I hope we can build a friendship through this, and educate people in the process. TrueBlue9LIVES (talk) 23:16, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

Sounds like a plan my friend! A huge issue with the last page was lack of refrences, if you could read through it all and hit a "citation needed" marker in appropriate places for me, I'll do the research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrueBlue9LIVES (talk • contribs) 00:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deuce

I would have appreciated if you would've posted whatever problems on the Deuce discography and List of Deuce songs articles on their talk pages before you jumped to a conclusion you thought was apropriate for the given situation ie. redirecting both pages to Deuce (singer) I have put alot of effort into his articles and I want them to grow, so if you could please adress problems on the appropriate talk pages beforehand that would be nice. I am going to put them back up for now because they need more unprovided information. Snyth (talk) 05:12, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Falling in Reverse, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Kygora 22:37, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Avenged Sevenfold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Get Scared, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I would also like to add that removing categories is considered disruptive so please refrain from removing any more categories from the page. Thank you. ≈ GunMetal Angel 22:20, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not do rumors. Please stop your disruptions • GunMetal Angel 23:34, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Gunmetal Angel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. GunMetal Angel 00:11, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Really...? You're seriously saying that calling you a "troll" is a personal attack? Wow. The Catalyst (talk) 20:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Get Scared. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Danny n j3t.png

Thanks for uploading File:Danny n j3t.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong person?

I think you left this warning for at the wrong person's talk page. I would suggest retracting it. Best, Jenks24 (talk) 00:29, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't. He vandalized the article for Hollywood Undead's album Swan Songs. He made several vandalizing changes, such as he changed "studio album by Hollywood Undead" to "studio album by Deuce", he ruined the "track listing" section, and he replaced "Rock Sound" with "Gay Sound". Changes like these are obviously due to his interest in the band's rival, Deuce, which is not surprising. Look at his edit (left) and my edit (right, which fixed it): http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Swan_Songs_%28Hollywood_Undead_album%29&action=historysubmit&diff=471765814&oldid=471439218 The Catalyst (talk) 00:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, maybe I did leave it for the wrong person. If I did, I apologize for that. The Catalyst (talk) 00:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Cynical skin.jpg

Hello, Panic Reaper!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Cynical skin.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Vulnerable by the used.png

Thanks for uploading File:Vulnerable by the used.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:08, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Danny n j3t.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Danny n j3t.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please help clean up the article about Ronald_J_Radke

Hi I would appreciate your help as I'm new on here. I'm not sure how to clean up bare URL's Iv'e looked on the article bare links helper but I cannot get my head around it also his profile need a little expansion. I have noticed your contributions to the article Falling In Reverse. Again your help is very much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.182.75 (talk) 18:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Linking Park album

Hi Panic Reaper, I have fixed the cut and paste move on the article, and the article is now edit protected too. This is not a good thing, so I will be lifting protection later. This kind of edit warring and move warring is very disruptive. If anyone goes on edit warring over the article title before the album is (pre-)released, I will be blocking whoever does so. If you would like to have the article moved, please discuss it on the talkpage, and if there is consensus, make use of requested moves if there is consensus the article should be moved. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sources

Removing sourced information is unnecessary [1].Hoponpop69 (talk) 03:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. When you recently edited Deuce (singer), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nine Lives and Co-production (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Deuce NineLives-Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Deuce NineLives-Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Deuce NineLives-Cover.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Deuce NineLives-Cover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Associated acts

Suggest you take a look here, it says the associated acts section should be used all but what you are using it for. • GunMetal Angel 14:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LMFAO you're the same guy who had me blocked for calling you a troll since you took that as a "personal attack" hahaha. I guess I should expect no less from the likes of you. Why don't you go do this crap to pages like Falling in Reverse, hm? All I asked was that you discuss it with me on the Talk page and instead you have to go around and get me blocked. I'm starting to think you're holding a personal grudge. Panic Reaper (talk) 13:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One: you were not blocked for your personal attack months ago, you were actually more of blocked for edit warring in the same case of which you were blocked for this case. And two; no I don't have any personal grudge against you, in fact I don't even know you. I mean keep in pure mind that I actually gave you a warning in mind that if you're gonna keep this up, you're gonna get blocked but ignored each warning each time and thus you were blocked both times as a result. That isn't my problem; I tried to help you before it had to come to that, but you wouldn't listen. • GunMetal Angel 22:53, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hrs for edit warring. You have been advised more than once how to use "associated acts" and you do nothing but revert against consensus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Panic Reaper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All I asked for the guy who requested to have me blocked is that he discuss the edit with me on the Talk page before editing. He is just holding a personal grudge for the one time I simply called him a "troll" several months ago.

Decline reason:

I don't understand how this is relevant to the reason for your block, which is edit warring. I looked at Talk:Escape the Fate, and I couldn't find the discussion that you had there about the changes the two of you disagreed about. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:31, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Panic Reaper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That's the point. Before he removed certain content from the page, I simply asked that he discuss it with me on the Talk page first, which he refused to do so and just continued reverting my edits. The page should've been left where it was before he started editing it until we came to an agreement, which he wouldn't let happen. It's completely unfair to block me for this when I was trying to discuss it with him. He should've been blocked.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block. Please note: (1) Do not edit war even if you think you are right; (2) See the comments below; (3) Read the guide to appealing blocks, particularly the section WP:NOTTHEM. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You of course know that's the opposite of how things work? You of course have also read the guidelines for "Associate acts" as presented to you (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are a bunch of other pages like the one he kept trying to edit, and he's edited them before. Why doesn't he "fix" those? Panic Reaper (talk) 14:20, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I'm still not getting it. The way it works is, if there's a disagreement, you discuss it on the talk page, reach a consensus, and then the stable version that's agreed on is in the article. But you don't seem to have participated in any discussion on the talk page, and you do seem to have reverted to your preferred version when there wasn't a clear consensus on the talk page. If you were 'trying to discuss it with him,' I'd see a section on the talk page in which you explain why you think your preferred version is the one that best fits Wikipedia's guidelines, but I can't find that. I don't know much about Wikipedia's guidelines for 'associated acts,' but I do know that repeatedly reverting edits without a clear consensus on the talk page is pointless. The other person can revert just as easily as you can; nothing is accomplished but disruption. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then why isn't he blocked as well? He didn't try to find an agreement or start a section in the talk page. The page was like it was for probably a year. I simply asked him to discuss why he was editing it in the Talk page and he refused to do so. What's so complicated about that? He was edit warring as well.Panic Reaper (talk) 15:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You were Bold, he reverted, you then discuss ... NOT revert, revert, revert - as per WP:BRD. There's also very little to discuss, considering your edits were wholly against the guidelines on "associated acts". You'll also need to read WP:EBUR in addition to WP:NOTTHEM (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I asked him to discuss why he wants to change it on the Talk page but he just kept reverting my edits. He's the one who wanted to change it, he should be the one starting a discussion. Plus, he edits loads of other pages with the same issues he's complaining about but he doesn't "fix" them. Panic Reaper (talk) 01:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And not to mention, at least I came to your talk page to discuss things over the first time you reverted me, and I gave you a clear up & steady direction of the guideline of how to use that field and you ignored it like a big "fuck this, I'm doing it my way and I'll report you if you don't like it." • GunMetal Angel 22:35, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What? You never came to my Talk page. Oh wait, are you referring to the thing on the Get Scared page months ago? I was simply annoyed because you kept calling adding sourced speculation to the page "disruptions". Not rumors, but speculation. But you never came to my page to discuss the issue on the Escape the Fate page. There are other pages with the same issue that I see you edit, why don't you fix them? Plus, the associated acts you removed are heavily related. All of those bands are bands that a member was a part of and the band toured with several times. You removed The Word Alive, but not blessthefall or Falling in Reverse? I at least think it's totally unfair that I don't get a notice that I'm being reported. I never reverted your edits on that page, I just re-added the information just like twice and I was randomly blocked. There are other people on the page who didn't agree with you about removing the acts, and since it's multiple people vs you, it should've been you who started the discussion. Panic Reaper (talk) 01:53, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm...does "touring with" meet the definition of "associated acts", as per the Wikipedia definition? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:51, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, scroll up two sections. I left you that message the day before you were given this block. It was not "months ago", however the one I gave you months ago should have made it clear that what you were doing wasn't right. • GunMetal Angel 22:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Escape the Fate's fourth studio album

The article Escape the Fate's fourth studio album has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. See also WP:NALBUMS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §everal⇒|Times 16:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Escape the Fate's fourth studio album for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Escape the Fate's fourth studio album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escape the Fate's fourth studio album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rushyo ^Talk 17:25, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Falling in Reverse

Please leave the genre box alone till as reliable source that discusses the genre is found not a sidebox source. Ericdeaththe2nd (Talk)

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Songs About Jane, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:26, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hollywood Undead in 2009.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hollywood Undead in 2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —innotata 00:29, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Craig mabbitt performing in 2011.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Craig mabbitt performing in 2011.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Escape the Fate

Hi Panic Reaper, I came just ask your cooperation to participate in a discussion that I created on the talk page of etf, to put an end to the etf is screamo or not, enter in the discussion and give your opinion about it in the talk page of etf. Edu Mabbitt (talk) 07:35, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Thedeadrabbitts.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Thedeadrabbitts.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheaptricksandtheatricsbsides.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cheaptricksandtheatricsbsides.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Etfinstudio.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Etfinstudio.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Dead Rabbitts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Supergroup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Dead Rabbitts

Hello. I see you created this article recently. Are there any sources for it that aren't twitter, facebook, or other self-published sources? If you're not aware, there's a set of general notability criteria for musical groups at WP:BAND - can they be demonstrated to meet any of those? Thanks, Morwen - Talk 11:53, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for Edge of Reality (The Dead Rabbitts EP). I see you created that article with unreferenced and notability tags! Please don't do that. If you have doubts as to whether the article should be created, there's no harm waiting until you do have sources! Morwen - Talk 12:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Please can I urge you to consider citing some reliable sources for these articles. Morwen (Talk) 12:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eleven Seven Music, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deuce and Blondie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Notes from the Underground (Hollywood Undead album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slipknot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ungrateful, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attack Attack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Escape the Fate, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you.

Ihy34 (talk) 00:34, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Escape the Fate (album), without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Get Scared

The article Get Scared has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

EP does not appear to meet notability guidelines: WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cheap Tricks and Theatrics

The article Cheap Tricks and Theatrics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

EP does not appear to meet notability guidelines: WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cheaptricksandtheatrics.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cheaptricksandtheatrics.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Escape the Fate, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:HU DOTDCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:HU DOTDCover.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edge of Reality (EP) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edge of Reality (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edge of Reality (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cynical skin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cynical skin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Etf ungrateful cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Etf ungrateful cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]