User talk:Oscitare/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 23:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 23:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Cairo English School Empty Section

Is there a reason you have put this empty duplicated section back?

Thanks! Thinker77 (talk) 07:47, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Oh whoops. I didn't see the other section Accreditations. I've reverted my edits now, thanks for catching that! —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 07:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the cookies and the welcome

While I don't expect to be a terribly active contributor/editor I do very much appreciate the existence of Wikipedia and have contributed to it financially for years.

Does this mean I can now go ahead and make the edit I proposed to the "Trump endorsements" page or does that still require another, more credentialed user?

Thanks.

Jonmaustin (talk) 16:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

@Jonmaustin: you still need your account confirmed before you can edit semi-protected pages, your account will be automatically confirmed after you've been registered for 4 days and have made at least 10 edits. For now, I will take a look at your request and see what I can do. Once again welcome and happy editing! —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 16:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Postscript: I have taken a look at your edit request but it seems to me that the referenced newspaper does not fit Wikipedia's notability requirements and should not be added to the list. Thank you! —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 16:50, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Pickering High School, Ajax, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. There was nothing at all "impertinent" about that thread you removed. It was s pefectly normal template about the licensing of an image file. Meters (talk) 03:31, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Hey there (thanks for the belated welcome, LOL)! I just assumed that since PHS logo.jpg has been replaced by a totally different image it'd make sense to remove the thread, but now when I think about WP:TPNO WP:TPO, it should be allowed to stay. Thanks for catching this! —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 03:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

I would have no objection to collapsing or archiving that thread, but your edit summary was not appropriate. Meters (talk) 03:39, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Mike Murdock

I would like to clean the clear and present bias and non neutral language on the page. I am ok with a little critism but the page is not academically written According to the edit history of the page the bias edits and vandalism have been an issue since 2008. Also some of the "references " used by the writer are opinion pieces publish by tto have dr Murdock's honorary title used in his name since it is citeed in the document e trinity foundation I would also like h Pjlancer (talk) 03:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Craftsman brand proposed changes

Hi Skyllfully. I spent about 10 minutes trying to figure out how to reply to your comments on my proposed changes.

I made the tweaks you suggested.

Also I inquired about the footnote ordering problem which obviously is not a real problem. I tried refreshing the page quite a few times the day I made the edits, but the ordering was still bonked. Today I see the footnote numbering has caught up with the changes.

PS I read the page about signing posts. Not sure exactly how this should go, even after seeing the example. In any event, I am not a regular editor for Wikipedia, but I try my best to follow the rules and recommendations vis a vis editing pages.

Scottmeltzer (talk) 00:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Scott Meltzer

Your draft article, Draft:Ontario Speed Skating Association

Hello, Skyllfully. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ontario Speed Skating Association".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:38, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:About.com homepage.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:About.com homepage.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BuyMyFace logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BuyMyFace logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vantage Airport Group logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vantage Airport Group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 15 November 2018 (UTC)