User talk:OffensiveUsername69

== February 2018 ==

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OffensiveUsername69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

lies, unnecessary blocking and obviously the power of this tool has gotten to his head. I am nothing but a model Wikipedian. I think that what you have forgotten to consider is how the Wikipedia community will react to such a prolific (yours truly) figure being blocked. This is a frank misuse of power.

Lots of love,

     OffensiveUsername69

Decline reason:

Obvious troll is obvious. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 01:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OffensiveUsername69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Edit: Your sarcasm humours me, Mr Jpgordon. I will give you one more chance to unblock me. Please consider this: [[REDACTED - Oshwah] this.]

Decline reason:

Obviously creating unblock requests to waste the time of admins. Talk page access is now revoked. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:18, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.