User talk:Non Halal Bacon

Special:Diff/879613496

This is unacceptable. Stop being racist or you will have a trip to WP:ANI. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 10:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Got a problem with the edit? Hey! Delete it and reinsert the wrong version. Eh? Non Halal Bacon (talk) 10:21, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page T'ien Hsia Monthly has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. ― A Poor Historian (talk) 10:25, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. My edit was fine. It is the summary you didn't like. Eh? Non Halal Bacon (talk) 10:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Stop it with the trolling edit summaries, now. bonadea contributions talk 10:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I AM SORRY. Non Halal Bacon (talk) 10:26, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 10:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I've seen it. Non Halal Bacon (talk) 10:29, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

-- The Anome (talk) 10:35, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Non Halal Bacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will request username change to something noncontroversial. I already gave up with stupid comments. I didn't vandalise one single time.

Decline reason:

No. Your primary purpose in coming here appears to be to make offensive comments denigrating Muslims, and has had the secondary effect of wasting the time of several other editors in cleaning up the mess. Editing Wikipedia is a privilege, not a right. The Anome (talk) 10:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.