User talk:Nemanjic

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Mehmed Paša Sokolović Bridge, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Tadija (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SGGH ^ping! 18:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skender-Vakuf

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Skender-Vakuf, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Kneževo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kneževo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In particular, Wikipedia is not a WP:BATTLEGROUND for national pride. It is completely inappropriate to replace an article with your own preferred version. And it is also inappropriate to create new articles under your preferred name on the same subject. -- Whpq (talk) 15:31, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Kneževo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kneževo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Whpq (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adminstrator's Noticeboard

As we are having difficulty, I've opened a thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Geopolitical ethnic and religious conflicts#Kneževo, Bosnia and Herzegovina to discuss the complete replacement of content you have done on the Kneževo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the attemtps to create alternate versions. -- Whpq (talk) 19:29, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SmackBot

Thanks for your message, some kind of explanation is needed. Rich Farmbrough 19:40 20 May 2010 (UTC).

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kneževo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Whpq (talk) 15:46, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is untrue and should not exist the way it is now. I am from the city, a serb from the city and this article is untrue and does not have the detail I can provide.

If it can't have factual details, then it should not exist as a fictional article.

Blocked and topic-banned

For sockpuppeting (see Lazar666 (talk · contribs) and 168.180.19.224 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)) and a protracted campaign of POV-driven edit-warring against consensus, you have been blocked for 2 weeks. In addition, under the rules of WP:ARBMAC#Discretionary sanctions, you are now permanently topic-banned from the article Kneževo, Bosnia and Herzegovina and all edits related to it. This means that even after your block expires, you will not be allowed to make any edits about this topic; if you do make any, you will immediately be re-blocked. You will be welcome to make constructive edits in other fields. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:29, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Skender Vakuf School and Hotel in the Background.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Skender Vakuf School and Hotel in the Background.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Skender Vakuf Old Mosque with Ottoman Graves on the Right.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Skender Vakuf Old Mosque with Ottoman Graves on the Right.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Skender Vakuf New Mosque Looking from the Old Mosque.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Skender Vakuf New Mosque Looking from the Old Mosque.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to try and save this image, it looks valueable Please wait until his account is unlocked before deleting. James Michael DuPont (talk) 00:15, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've blocked your account for a month for edit warring and sockpuppeting on Kneževo. Your topic ban as set by Future Perfect is still in effect, and edit warring while logged out violates that. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 14:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked for sock puppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nemanjic. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 22:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]