User talk:Neilthecellist

If you ask a question here, I will go to your talk page to respond, unless you state otherwise.

Welcome To Wikipedia Neilthecellist

A Cordial Greeting From J.Steinbock (Talk Page)

Hello, Neilthecellist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your recent contributions and future influence on Wikipedia. I hope you find pleasure and enjoyment from other Wikipedians. We are glad to have you in our community! Here are a few links for you and others, to better educate yourself on what being a Wikipedian really means:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia

Simplified Ruleset

How To Edit A Page

Editing, Policy, Conduct, and Structure Tutorial

Picture Tutorial

How To Write A Great Article

Naming Conventions

Manual Of Style

Wikipedia Glossary

Additional Information

If you are ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there is also the Topical index.

If you have not already, drop by the New User Log and tell others a bit about yourself.

Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is What Wikipedia Is Not. If you have any questions or concerns, do not hesitate to see the Help Pages or add a question to the Village Pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Have a wonderful experience!

Feel free to ask me or other Wikipedians questions any time. If you have any issues that you cannot resolve, contact me at Talk Page

A Greeting From J.Steinbock

Vanity Page

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Russell Zen may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Nationalparks 02:12, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to adding your name to other pages (i.e. List of cellists). If unsure, please consult the notability guidelines. CA387 18:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I'll take your word for it, then. It's just that I noticed that someone deleted your name off the list; I assumed it was you after I saw the "Vanity Page" thing in your user talk. Oh well, I guess you know the saying... CA387 23:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

typo in IB page

hi!

you noticed the typo on the IB page and pointed it out on the talk page, why not fix the typo yourself =P!

--Peregrine_^AY 10:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

China in the UN

I have hopefully resolved your questions on the Chinese UN seat on the UN talkpage. If you have any further queries/questions/etc. please post a message on my talk page so I am aware and hopefully able to help. --CTerry 17:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Russell. Got your message. GA resolutions are actually binding on some things (IE the UN budget), and one of the things its binding on is who the UN recognises. In any case, shortly after the GA resolution the Americans have their rapproachment with China, and as a result recognised the PRC over the ROC anyways. --CTerry 16:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I read what you asked me, and i would say i know much of the Halo universe, and would gladly assist you in the making of your articles, tell me what you need and i'll work my magic on it.

TAS

I only attended TAS for two years, and I really don't know if I'm the right person to ask about it. From what I read about your current high school, it seems just as good as TAS. I know next to nothing about MUN at TAS, although if you want, I might be able to redirect you to someone who does. -- Mattrixed ^Talk 08:22, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halo Characters

Basically, I felt like it.

For now, I'm commenting out some of the stuff which I can't at the moment, verify or source. The other Spartans all kick the bucket in FS, so I'm going to add those in and then worry about the rest later. By all means, if you want to show them again. David Füchs ^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)} 15:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 209.66.200.45 lifted or expired. Request handled by: Yamla 22:33, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Halo

Wikiproject Halo
Call to Members

In order to streamline and coordinate further improvement to Halo-related articles, there is an active roll call to all Wikipedians who put themselves down as participants. To show your continued involvement in the project, simply go here and sign your name. If you do not wish to be active, et al, simply ignore this notice and you will not be bugged again. Thanks, David Fuchs^{(talk / frog blast the vent core!)}

AfD nomination of Halo universe

An article that you have been involved in editing, Halo universe, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halo universe. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 20:56, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Vegas 2. Thank you. Ni mi Ti ze 19:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your comment

I responded to your comment on my talk page; I hope I cleared some things up. FlamingSilmaril (talk) 20:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow Six Vegas 2

Of course more content needs to be added, but as it is the article is a shambles.

There is no section describing the gameplay,
character descriptions are too specific and are not supposed to be the first part of a page (that's where gameplay goes, character sections are usually concise and either precede or follow the plot),
the campaign section more closely resembles a plot section than a description of what the campaign is (it is also far too specific, with something like three or four paragraphs devoted to the first mission; entire plot sections are usually limited to three or four paragraphs),
and the ACES section should be moved as a subsection of gameplay.

Sections that need expansion include multiplayer and reception, and a possible addition (but not a priority) could be a development section. I tried reorganizing the article accordingly twice in the past, but each time after about a week the article falls back into disarray, so I've reduced myself to putting up that cleanup template in the hope some change will happen. For an example of a VG article that needs cleanup, look no further than the original Rainbow Six Vegas. For a generic example of an FA, see Halo 3. Odds are Vegas 2 will never reach FA status, but that doesn't mean it can't have some semblance of organization and meet a few standards. Comandante Talk 00:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've already gone ahead and reorganized the article. I've readded the removed gameplay section, and moved a few things around. I'll remove the cleanup template of the changes stick this time around, but keep in mind there is still much that needs to be done. Comandante Talk 01:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Comandante Talk 01:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I never declared it vandalism (If i did) and He/she included (XBOX360 & PS3) etc. to the dates which is NOT needed. Please stay civil when you come to my talk page. Ni mi Ti ze 01:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I stay civil and I NEVER insulted you, dont start lieing over here. I really don't understand what you are saying. On the Rainbow six release dates, under that is where it says which consoles, THATS WHAT I MEAN, stay civil and if you dont I wont respond to you. Ni mi Ti ze 15:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yea, and don't think am some stupid guy who DOSENT know what I'm doing. I'm not acting like one so get that THROUGH your head, Ive atleast MADE edits to articles and according to your edits, on tools.wikimedia.org, youv made almost NO edits, your total is 176 edits, and for someone to be here since '06 I would know this person to stay civil, and not attacking some one, and have a decent amount of edits, before you come to my talk page and say "I've been here since Wiki first started, I know what civil means"????? Iv'e been on Wiki for ONLY 2 months, 1 month of me learning all (ALL) the Wiki guidelines and policies, plus me having 2000 edits. I stay civil and I dont go to a person's talk page, and start throwing stuff at them. Ni mi Ti ze 15:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your not going to stay civil, fine by me, I wont listen to any more of you, and you attacked me with the work "suck a big ego" please stop or I will report you. And YOU can't shut up and stop replying to me. Ni mi Ti ze 06:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dated cleanup tags

Hi, thanks for your message, SmackBot does not generally add tags, but merely dates those that are already there. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 20:46 24 March 2008 (GMT).

Hi Sweety

Regarding this rather violent edit of yours: [1]. "...except in Germany, where the game has been delayed. The Microsoft Windows version, however, has been delayed until April 15, 2008." – The two sentences talk about being delayed; how can one have "however" in a sentence? It would need to read: "...the PS3/Xbox versions are all on time. The Microsoft Windows version, however, has been delayed..." – See what I mean? I'll wait for your reply. By the way, please try not to use capitals in edit summaries as it's considered "shouting" on the internet. Thanks buddy :-) Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 11:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for the kind words, and I appreciate your edits to the article as well. →SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 00:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow Six 2 Vandalism

No problem! Thanks for the quick reply and resolution. :) I really tried not to sound like a jerk but I did want to get across that I meant well. If it's OK (I don't know the policy) I'll remove my edits on your talk page and just leave this little blurb. Can I do that, just to clean-up this stuff? Let me know what ya think, thanks again!! --Scottymoze (talk) 18:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up complete. Thanks and happy editing! --Scottymoze (talk) 02:21, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:172.202.244.250

It's obviously vandalism, but per WP:BITE, I left a softer warning due to it being his (apparent) first edit. xenocidic (talk) 19:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow Six Vegas: 2 leak

As I stated it lacks information, unlike Half life 2 more reliable sites/sources has been given. While you just gave a link to a not reliable source. So untill it passes WP:Crystalball + WP:RS and WP:V it should not be included in Rainbow Six Vegas 2 till then, if you do not agreed, then please point out why. Take contact! --Kanonkas : Take Contact 14:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

After just reading your message i am still unsure of what you consider to be Co-Op in a game. Co-op in Tom Clancey's Rainbow Six Vegas 2 is different from many others. As the change to the article said the AI team members are now included in the game (as not seen in previous versions). Because of this the main player now has two more additional team members added to the team of two 'HUMAN' players. If you are still able to follow this specific type of Co-op AI team members can only be controlled by player 1.

Cheers for the edit as i do see a improvement from what was once there.

RichR17 —Preceding unsigned comment added by RichR17 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Hello, just to let you know, even though the IP you just reported was blocked anyway, we usually ask that users not be reported until they have made vandalism edits after being given a "level 4" warning. You can find warning templates for dealing with vandalism here – the reason for using these is that we try to assume good faith, and ideally someone will stop when they hear their edits aren't allowed (this doesn't happen very often in practice, but occasionally it does avoid the need for a block). Thanks for your help either way, and happy editing! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned section -- Whoever wrote in this section, please remember to sign sections

Because Co-op should be under multiplayer, because it is multiplayer after all. I was searching for info about the Co-op, and i found it stupid to be above multiplayer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.221.60 (talk) 11:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Barnstars.

Heh thanks. And thanks for catching my accidental deletion, I was half asleep, shoulda looked at the diffs better. Nar Matteru (talk) 02:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you

the same neilthecellist that outed Ubisoft for using the Reloaded crack? If so, I love you. Nar Matteru (talk) 21:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, that really cracked me up, especially since I was suffering from that (Actually ubisoft didn't even get around to giving me the fix, till 2 weeks after I already had the "fix" from a forum post cuz they never got around to updating my damn ticket) Really pissed me off, as it was my first time using a legit download service and to not be able to play something I payed 50 bucks for made me all Grrr and $#@*$#%&!@ Nar Matteru (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AIV report

Watch your reports, as this one today; editor hasn't been here in two weeks. Of course, I blocked them and then got yelled at for it :-) Tan ǀ 39 15:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]