User talk:Ned stark was a racist but you cheered him on anyway

August 2022

Hello, I'm Nythar. I noticed that you recently removed content from Varys without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nythar^T^.^C 04:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ned stark was a racist but you cheered him on anyway (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

duplicate-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:16, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Varys. 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 👋❤️ (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔🤔) 04:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC) ?????[reply]

August 2022

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a clear violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that you do not intend to contribute positively to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:35, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ned stark was a racist but you cheered him on anyway (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ned stark was a wiki admin and a racist at the same time (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I have learned my lesson

Decline reason:

obviously not -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra, this user is a sock of User:A song of ice and fire is an awful series. aeschylus (talk) 11:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shocked! Shocked I say! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]