User talk:Nathraq
Proposal for standard infobox for History of [country] templates
[edit]Hi there! You're a member of WikiProject History, so I'm just informing you about a proposal I've made about standardizing History of [country] templates (like Template:History of France). The discussion is located at the talk page for WikiProject History—your comments and criticism are welcome. Thank you. Mr. Absurd (talk) 05:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I saw that you are interested in former Yugoslavia issues, and that you are member of Croatia project. I tried to post the following addition to Joip Broz Tito page, but was deleted by DIREKTOR.It is a shame that he is so biased that he does not want even to consider linking Tito to Bleiburg massacre- and he commanded Partisans then, and noone got punished for it later. Like he did not know. I think it is imperative to put Tito in context of Bleiburg massacre. Can you help perhps by rephrasing and reposting, of course, if you agree with me?
The tekst was as follows:
After official end of war in Europe (VE) in May 1945, several tens of thousands of people, mostly Croatians, Serbs and Slovenes, Axis collaborators and their families, but also uninvolved people fleeing communists, tried to surrender to Allied British forces near the town of Bleiburg, Austria (see Bleiburg massacre)[1]. They were turned down, and forcibly returned to Yugoslav partisan forces. In the aftermath, many were killed without trial in the vicinity, or sent on death marches [2]. The exact numbers of killed will most probably never be known, as figures range from 55.000 [3], to 12.000 [4].
The extent of Tito's direct involvement in these events is not clear, but it is highly unlikely that he was unaware of them. In any case, he was clearly resposible for them under the command responsibility. Petricek (talk) 11:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
I guess he is. That is why I contacted Croatian Helsinki Commitee and Croatian Institute for History for help. Maybe they can help.Petricek (talk) 06:19, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Tito and Bleiburg
[edit]I thought you might like to take a look at my addition to Tito's page, now fully referenced, and my addition to discussion page. I got all the data from professional high-profile historian. DIREKTOR is not such a great authority in this: he is an amateur,in medicine just like me, and if he deletes this addition, that will be a sure sign of his serious bias- I alerted Croatian Television, and they are watching this, great material for a TV show. DIREKTOR will not be brave enough to expose himself, I am sure. Nevertheless. Any suggestions who to alert on Wiki if he nevertheless deletes the addition?Petricek (talk) 08:29, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Re - Mongol Invasion of Croatia
[edit]Hi, Nathraq! Thanks for support. I already started that section few monhts ago, but an IP deleted that section (probably Hungarian IP). I wrote it today again "by the way", since I am working on the article Klis Fortress, which is somewhat related to it...If you have some time, you can clean up some grammar there, if you like? Anyway, thanks! --Kebeta (talk) 18:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I have responded on that talk page with a question. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:32, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 3
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Molly Hagan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Election (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree files
[edit]Some of your uploads may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 15#OTRS pending since July. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f7/Magic_Wand_Icon_229981_Color_Flipped.svg/220px-Magic_Wand_Icon_229981_Color_Flipped.svg.png)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Nathraq. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
You have been pruned from a list
[edit]Hi Nathraq! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)