User talk:Nadsab

various Early Settlers categories

Hi, before you expend too much more effort into populating these categories, a couple of things to consider. First, the categories are mis-capitalized. The "Early Settlers" is not a proper name and should not be capitalized in the category names. Second, what is the criteria for inclusion in such categories? What is an "early settler"? Is it anyone who happened to be among the first settlers in a community regardless of when (I mean some parts of northern Michigan and the UP were not settled until relatively late). That may seem too imprecise of a criteria. Also, when would a person no longer be considered an "early settler" of a place? Also, given the way the categories are named, it seems inappropriate to include places within the categories. Third, the general rule is to only create categories and subcategories when there is a need to divide a larger category that is already over-populated (or at least where there already exists a substantial number of articles that would fit the criteria for the new category). Is it really necessary to have subcategories for each county in Michigan when at present there are relatively few articles. I mean, there may be enough to create categories for southeast Michigan counties and perhaps Kent County and a few others, but there may not be any articles present on early settlers in many of the counties, and may not ever be any in some cases, making the existence of the empty categories unnecessary (and distracting, since you have to open the category to discover that it is empty).

My suggestion is to begin slowly, rather than creating a large number of categories that may ultimately end up being deleted. You might want to start by putting together a list or two of names for existing articles and likely candidates for new articles (remember that not every early settler necessarily merits a separate encyclopedia article). older ≠ wiser 18:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there older - wiser , Thanks for the thoughtful input. As to the The "Early Settlers of the United States" category, I left that astray and switched to the "United States Early Settlers" category which I think is a bit easier to find as a sub under the Settlers cat - the original is deleted. I was thinking that the criteria for inclusion in such categories would be something like - the very first folks who settled in what is now known as a community. For example, one would likely not consider an early settler a person who came to a town that had been on the map for 30 or 40 years. However if someone came to a township or a city, village, county, etc. within the first five or ten years of it's existence, I think it would be fair or appropriate to include such a person in the cat. Common sense would dictate that. Yes, some parts of northern Michigan and the UP were not settled until relatively late - how would you classify as being relatively late? If a community was not founded until say, 1920, should early settlers be excluded for consideration? Personally I don't agree. If a town was founded in 1980 then yes, the first few folks in that town could be considered being early settlers of that town. Needless to say the chances of finding anyone on wikipedia, or anywhere else for that matter, who would be considered an early settler of a town which was incorporated in the past few decades are either remote, or would not hold much historical interest for anyone to include such folks on such a list.

I do agree with you that not every settler merits a seperate article. I don't agree that it is inappropriate to include places within the categories - this is a common occurance in wikipedia and one could find many examples, i.e., county categories, etc. I was starting out by including only articles which referred to specific individual settlers, not articles which used the concept of settlers as an umbrella sense or in a generic sense.

As far as the idea of not creating new categories unless there already exists a substantial number of articles that would merit the creation of a new category is concerned, I have found over 500 articles which are related to early settlers throughout Michigan - settlers in about every county in the state. It may or may not be absolutely necessary to have county subcategories for these settlers that's true, but it would be easier to search for settlers if an individual was looking for early settlers in a particular county. They could be all lumped together in the Michigan cat or by state cat, and as the state early settlers category list(s) grow, it could be later sub divided into counties - that's a good idea.

My plan was to also nicely format each category page with some highlights of early settlers for that state, county, etc.

For further discussion see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_February_18#NEW_NOMINATIONS thanks. Nadsab 19:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Edward H. McNamara

A tag has been placed on Edward H. McNamara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 14:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:United States Early Settlers

Category:United States Early Settlers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:12, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kent County Early Settlers

Category:Kent County Early Settlers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:GeoStarkweather.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GeoStarkweather.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]