User talk:MtADorey

A cupcake for you!

Thanks for getting started on Wikipedia! Sub specie aeternitatis (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for starting with ANTH 2501 on Wikipedia! Sub specie aeternitatis (talk) 18:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Archaeology and animation

The article Archaeology and animation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTESSAY. Essentially a collection personal critiques of depictions of archaeology in popular media by the primary author. I don't think it's salvageable: in theory, something like this could exist as a subarticle of Archaeology#Popular views of archaeology, but the current content is subjective, specific to particular works, and almost entirely without references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Roe (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the talk page spam. I meant to send the article to AfD (below), not PROD. Joe Roe (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Archaeology and animation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Archaeology and animation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archaeology and animation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joe Roe (talk) 14:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]