User talk:Movieresearch

Welcome

Hello, Movieresearch, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 05:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article is up for deletion

Hello and thank you for taking the time to create Digital Nitrate Prize. However I was unable to find any mention of it in Google, Yahoo, or Ask.com. You may comment on this page. This is nothing personal and I encourage you to copy the text of the current article into a text document so when the prize does exist you can create the article again. See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Digital_Nitrate_Prize --Mboverload 06:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for the comments, and I hope I'm answering them properly. The Prize is genuine and it is only recently formed, so you will find few mentions in Google since it takes so long to promulgate! However, if you want to search the archives of the AMIA mailing list, you'll find endless discussions about the criteria for the prize, etc. Much of the correspondence is private, but if you're really interested it can be found.

Help requested

Hello. How can I help you? H e nrik 18:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for answering so quickly!

Let me be a little schematic: 1) Is this the right place to answer you? 2) If not... where? how? 3) Is this the right form? 4) How do I deal with "deletion requests." I've posted an accurate article and a few people are questioning it, but I'm not sure the correct way to answer/deal with it.

Thank you. :-) Movieresearch 18:51, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, this is the right place. You can sign your posts by typing ~~~~ at the end, which will help people know who wrote what. While I personally find Digital Nitrate Prize interesting, it may not be suitable for inclusion in wikipedia yet even though it is accurate - The concerns people have with it on the deletion vote page mostly boil down to that it is too new; it doesn't have any verifiable sources any depicts events that hasn't occured yet (as the prize is still in development, if I've understood things correctly?). If you have any third party, reliable sources, such as an article from a newspaper or something similar, please mention that here. Even though it may be deleted now, don't worry - if you in the future can make it meet wikipedias inclusion criteria, it can be recreated. I hope this helps! H e nrik 18:52, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi. I posted a reply to your question on my talk page. Just giving you a small note so you don't miss it. Cheers! H e nrik 12:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Edisonia Doorway-1896.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Edisonia Doorway-1896.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Vitascope Theater Buffalo Nov 1897 ad.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vitascope Theater Buffalo Nov 1897 ad.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:10, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

The Digital Nitrate Prize

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Digital Nitrate Prize, by Seattlenow (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Digital Nitrate Prize fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

recreated AfD'd content

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Digital Nitrate Prize, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:09, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not an admin, so I can not delete any articles. The issue of whether the topic should have a Wikipedia article has been raised twice, and the consensus was to delete in both cases--Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Nitrate Prize (2nd nomination). If you have new information that wasn't raised during the AfD discussions, or feel the deletion somehow violated Wikipedia:Deletion policy, you can raise the issue at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Seattlenow 18:40, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING!

You are in violation of Wikipedia policy for re-creating an article which was deleted through an article-for-deletion discussion. Your article has again been marked for deletion. If you persist in re-creating this article, you will be blocked for vandalism.

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Realkyhick 18:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Digital Nitrate Prize deletion

The "Digital Nitrate Prize" may be a sincere and legitimate operation, but that alone does not make it a candidate for inclusion on Wikipedia. One criterion is whether it is notable. When I search Google for "digital nitrate prize", I find a number of web-sites but there are predominately (if not all) self-publicity; there appears to be very little independent third-party material about this. Despite that you said to me, its only listed sponsor is the Buffalo International Film Festival - which is, I believe, also one of your creations. I'm not doubting its existence as a charity, but its notability seems limited to self-created web-site entries, blogs, circularly-referential sites, etc. I can find little independent evidence for it. My view would be that again this is an attempt at self-publicity. Edward Summer's biography on Wikipedia is also bordering on show business hyperbole: is it really necessary to list 16 different occupations? His numerous minor activities as listed by IMDb hardly make him out to be a truly notable person in the film industry! -- MightyWarrior 17:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply. For your information, I am not the "gatekeeper" for Wikipedia: decisions are taken by consensus (which is the reason for debates such as AfD). The requirements taken into consideration when the community decides whether to delete an article (and for other decisions) are to be found in the Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines. As I mentioned above, one of these is notability - I think it was this guideline that the above article appeared not to meet. Articles are not owned by anyone in particular, so it is not a personal attack on you or the movie industry. The best place to ask any additional questions that you have is probably the Wikipedia Helpdesk - there should be more experienced editors than me there to assist you. You may also wish to look at the welcome page. -- MightyWarrior 19:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've also had a look at the external AMIA web-site, as you suggested. I can find no indication that the AMIA itself endorses or supports the Digital Nitrate Prize. There are a number of announcements made by Edward Summer in the public archive of their list server together with a small number of replies - but because this is self-promotion I don't believe that it counts as independent evidence. The above guidelines and policies will tell you what the Wikipedia community consider to be independent references for the purposes of establishing the notability (or not) of an article's topic. You also asked about the NYT: possibly the following quotes from the above linked policy are relevant: In general, the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny involved in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the evidence and arguments of a particular work, the more reliable it is., and: Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources. -- MightyWarrior 20:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Stuart Vaughn, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nenyedi • ^{(Deeds•Talk)} 03:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Stuart Vaughn

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Stuart Vaughn. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.njrep.org/bios/vaughanbio.htm in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Stuart Vaughn with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Stuart Vaughn with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. Smashville 03:56, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Edison's Vitascope Theater

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Edison's Vitascope Theater, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Edison's Vitascope Theater is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Edison's Vitascope Theater, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:32, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjit Sandhu

Hello, Movieresearch. Concerning your contribution, Ranjit Sandhu, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://freenet.buffalo.edu/bah/h/movie/oral/index.html. As a copyright violation, Ranjit Sandhu appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ranjit Sandhu has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ranjit Sandhu and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ranjit Sandhu with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ranjit Sandhu.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Travellingcari (talk) 17:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Teefr

An editor has nominated Teefr, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teefr and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:BIFF-LOGO-COLOR-TM-RECT.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:BIFF-LOGO-COLOR-TM-RECT.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 13:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Edisonia Doorway-1896.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Edisonia Doorway-1896.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Todd-AO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Planet of the Apes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. When you recently edited The Story of Film: An Odyssey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon Douglas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Everett Greenbaum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Movieresearch. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests.
Message added 20:10, 24 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roycroft may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BIFF-LOGO-COLOR-TM-RECT.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BIFF-LOGO-COLOR-TM-RECT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ChromaDepth

The article ChromaDepth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

'No evidence of any notability'

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Buffalo International Jewish Film Festival for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Buffalo International Jewish Film Festival is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buffalo International Jewish Film Festival until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]